From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346ACC4332F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=ch6F7AqX; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SqtNQ2LYXz3cWN for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:21:42 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=ch6F7AqX; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SqtMV3170z30fF for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:20:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE418B81B04; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2DD1C433C8; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:20:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1702466449; bh=PG6K9VuJdcgKbvpqgnXCTy8CVJLGJ87KEH9VnhXqixE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ch6F7AqXQjjMxH4QZovM9tXn19t/mAiDiBVBrrQQ+Cap67EkztsefY8FkZrIyyeBG LmukSAUSf6e4VcbCNce3WGkJ6dds9RzIErkl5bFrojzSq1oiaWuKDkR4oNNLnVCMzF L9oEpn9kxPp6fbbY501FkU5Xb8ocNs18CzCnBatLg3kUIJu9Pwswl5ZBgVHsZ4LMgN T67jvVsexR+4t8xntrLgvJAW+Ngz1wyHl16nAYaYl7iiTLT/L9DYaZCLeTOVizYlHJ OH66wz4zDvsFYCtx6wMFO6Htag0taKSIJePK6AdGLJn27VjZJACVnk0fBGZ0399mxh CVPRz+78niZUg== X-Mailer: emacs 29.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Aneesh Kumar K.V To: Srikar Dronamraju , Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] powerpc/smp: Topology and shared processor optimizations In-Reply-To: <20231211025656.4lqrhnic5gynkuzq@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20231109054938.26589-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20231211025656.4lqrhnic5gynkuzq@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:50:40 +0530 Message-ID: <87wmtimjqv.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin , Rohan McLure , linuxppc-dev , Josh Poimboeuf Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Srikar Dronamraju writes: > * Srikar Dronamraju [2023-11-09 11:19:28]: > > Hi Michael, > >> PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique >> challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared >> processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for shared processor >> systems. >> >> > > Did you get a chance to look at this patchset? > Do you see this getting pulled into your merge branch? > I havent seen any comments that requires a change from the current patchset. > It would be helpful if you could include the details mentioned in your reply in the commit message. Specifically, provide information about the over-provisioned config and if you plan to send another update, please remove the additional changes in the printk_once section. Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM) Thank you. -aneesh