From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/mm: add radix__remove_section_mapping()
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:18:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpewtfl4.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481831443-22761-5-git-send-email-arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Tear down and free the four-level page tables of the linear mapping
> during memory hotremove.
>
> We borrow the basic structure of remove_pagetable() and friends from the
> identically-named x86 functions.
>
Can you add more details here, which explain why we don't need to follow
the RCU page table free when doing memory hotunplug ?
> Signed-off-by: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-radix.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
....
....
> +static void remove_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pte_t *pte;
> +
> + pte = pte_start + pte_index(addr);
> + for (; addr < end; addr = next, pte++) {
> + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
> + if (next > end)
> + next = end;
> +
> + if (!pte_present(*pte))
> + continue;
> +
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> +
> + flush_tlb_mm(&init_mm);
Why call a flush here. we do that at the end of remove_page_table .
Isn't that sufficient ?
> +}
> +
> +static void remove_pmd_table(pmd_t *pmd_start, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long end, unsigned long map_page_size)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pte_t *pte_base;
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> +
> + pmd = pmd_start + pmd_index(addr);
> + for (; addr < end; addr = next, pmd++) {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +
> + if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (map_page_size == PMD_SIZE) {
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, (pte_t *)pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + pte_base = (pte_t *)pmd_page_vaddr(*pmd);
> + remove_pte_table(pte_base, addr, next);
> + free_pte_table(pte_base, pmd);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void remove_pud_table(pud_t *pud_start, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long end, unsigned long map_page_size)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pmd_t *pmd_base;
> + pud_t *pud;
> +
> + pud = pud_start + pud_index(addr);
> + for (; addr < end; addr = next, pud++) {
> + next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> +
> + if (!pud_present(*pud))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (map_page_size == PUD_SIZE) {
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, (pte_t *)pud);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + pmd_base = (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud);
> + remove_pmd_table(pmd_base, addr, next, map_page_size);
> + free_pmd_table(pmd_base, pud);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void remove_pagetable(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> + unsigned long map_page_size)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + unsigned long addr;
> + pgd_t *pgd;
> + pud_t *pud;
> +
> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next) {
> + next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +
> + pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> + if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
> + continue;
> +
> + pud = (pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
> + remove_pud_table(pud, addr, next, map_page_size);
> + free_pud_table(pud, pgd);
> + }
> +
> + flush_tlb_mm(&init_mm);
So we want to flush the full kernel tlb when we do a hotplug ?
May be check using flush_tlb_kernel_range(). Also that flush_tlb_mm() do
check for mm_is_thread_local(). Do we update init_mm correct to handle
that check ? I assume we want a tlbie() here instead of tlbiel() ?
> +}
> +
> int radix__create_section_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> unsigned long page_size = 1 << mmu_psize_defs[mmu_linear_psize].shift;
> @@ -482,6 +635,16 @@ int radix__create_section_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +int radix__remove_section_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long page_size = 1 << mmu_psize_defs[mmu_linear_psize].shift;
> +
> + start = _ALIGN_DOWN(start, page_size);
> + remove_pagetable(start, end, page_size);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-19 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-15 19:50 [PATCH v3 0/5] powerpc/mm: enable memory hotplug on radix Reza Arbab
2016-12-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc/mm: set the radix linear page mapping size Reza Arbab
2016-12-19 8:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-12-19 20:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-12-20 2:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-12-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] powerpc/mm: refactor {create, remove}_section_mapping() Reza Arbab
2016-12-19 9:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-12-19 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] powerpc/mm: refactor {create,remove}_section_mapping() Reza Arbab
2016-12-20 5:26 ` Balbir Singh
2016-12-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] powerpc/mm: add radix__create_section_mapping() Reza Arbab
2016-12-19 9:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-12-19 18:06 ` Reza Arbab
2016-12-21 7:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-12-20 6:28 ` Balbir Singh
2016-12-20 15:32 ` Reza Arbab
2016-12-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/mm: add radix__remove_section_mapping() Reza Arbab
2016-12-19 9:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2016-12-19 18:11 ` Reza Arbab
2016-12-19 20:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-12-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] powerpc/mm: unstub radix__vmemmap_remove_mapping() Reza Arbab
2016-12-16 14:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] powerpc/mm: enable memory hotplug on radix Balbir Singh
2016-12-19 17:58 ` Reza Arbab
2016-12-21 6:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpewtfl4.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=apopple@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).