From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (e24smtp02.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A62871A0202 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:16:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:16:47 -0200 Received: from d24relay02.br.ibm.com (d24relay02.br.ibm.com [9.13.184.26]) by d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3EF1DC0071 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:16:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (d24av03.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.95]) by d24relay02.br.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u0BFEEuG32375180 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:14:15 -0200 Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d24av03.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u0BFGg3D017881 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:16:42 -0200 From: "Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho" To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Steve Munroe Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add hwcap2 bits for POWER9 References: <568C272D.6000705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87egdsi4om.fsf@totoro.br.ibm.com> <1452267366.5201.12.camel@vnet.ibm.com> <568FE3D0.7080008@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:16:37 -0200 In-Reply-To: <568FE3D0.7080008@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:29:04 -0200") Message-ID: <87wprgdu3u.fsf@totoro.br.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Adhemerval Zanella writes: > On 08-01-2016 13:36, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 11:25 -0200, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: >>> Peter, this solves the issue you reported previously [1]. >>> >>> [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-12/msg00522.html >> >> Agreed, thanks. I'll also add the POWER9 support to the GCC side >> of the patch now that the glibc code is upstream. > > I do not see these bits being added in kernel side yet and GLIBC usual > only sync these kind of bits *after* they are included in kernel side. > So I would advise to either get these pieces (kernel support and hwcap > advertise) in kernel before 2.23 release, otherwise revert the patches. Ack. It has just been sent to the correspondent Linux mailing list: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-January/137763.html -- Tulio Magno