From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D04B70C9 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:31:58 +1000 (EST) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF30BDDD0B for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:31:57 +1000 (EST) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so162377fge.16 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Peter Korsgaard To: Byron Bradley Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 83xx: Add support for the Thecus N1200 NAS device References: <20090605030850.GF2054@yookeroo.seuss> From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:31:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20090605030850.GF2054@yookeroo.seuss> (David Gibson's message of "Fri\, 5 Jun 2009 13\:08\:50 +1000") Message-ID: <87ws7rxhjq.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, tim.ellis@mac.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >>>>> "David" == David Gibson writes: David> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:59:04PM +0100, Byron Bradley wrote: >> The Thecus N1200 is a NAS device with a single internal SATA disk and >> an eSATA port based on an MPC8347 SoC. David> Comments on a number of fairly minor device tree nits below: David> [snip] >> + soc8349@e0000000 { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; >> + device_type = "soc"; >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; >> + }; >> + >> + gpio1: gpio-controller@c00 { >> + #gpio-cells = <2>; >> + compatible = "fsl,mpc8347-gpio", "fsl,mpc8349-gpio"; David> This actually is an 8349 board, yes? Generally compatible should be David> listed from most specific to least specific, so the 8349 entry should David> go first. No, it's an 8347, to the gpio compatible is fine, but the soc8349 should be changed to 8347 above. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard