From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB81EC433EF for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 23:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Kqpcq3dgWz3chH for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:30:19 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=UOUUrMsz; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com (client-ip=178.60.130.6; helo=fanzine2.igalia.com; envelope-from=gpiccoli@igalia.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=UOUUrMsz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine.igalia.com [178.60.130.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KqjTh2Xq5z2xrc for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 05:38:48 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+2llGFga5QkASn4XVi2aetavO7ILP6dASiYzMijceyQ=; b=UOUUrMszI73hVVDlQl0qMGKpgi SURYnynivwToxWlxRFNHZuJUlYACg3pOlToF9uePQZKQj9Jh28x9HqFS+8ma2UKNqqfTZIoq5qPoX ZjKu0SXAHcAaL5fBZDxiontPvDun5f7GYgdbt4dCuiMpqF5UK3BAq1NYYAup9oZJISpA3f/6msVNv KxEGWm1/bKbhG1suPPcwhVBlVUZnIQWEhpqD+ct/zjPgjlzryTF/5q8gZE+Q8KVJ4Te371qBOe3Ly SxwsyKvT3lKFnIB4YpgxZ/QTp4/T994RncLE2AybyAnDHh154KcaeR4cHIlVzuqXykPOlGP9iLWEL 6VZKIX4Q==; Received: from [179.113.53.197] (helo=[192.168.1.60]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1nkWRh-000ALj-Dz; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:38:29 +0200 Message-ID: <88b19a1c-7cea-9a28-3770-e235c286efed@igalia.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:38:02 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/30] notifier: Show function names on notifier routines if DEBUG_NOTIFIERS is set Content-Language: en-US To: Xiaoming Ni , akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-19-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <9f44aae6-ec00-7ede-ec19-6e67ceb74510@huawei.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" In-Reply-To: <9f44aae6-ec00-7ede-ec19-6e67ceb74510@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:26:41 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, halves@canonical.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, feng.tang@intel.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de, corbet@lwn.net, paulmck@kernel.org, fabiomirmar@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, dyoung@redhat.com, Valentin Schneider , vgoyal@redhat.com, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang , openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, Arjan van de Ven , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@gpiccoli.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, senozhatsky@chromium.org, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, vkuznets@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 27/04/2022 22:01, Xiaoming Ni wrote: > [...] > Duplicate Code. > > Is it better to use __func__ and %pS? > > pr_info("%s: %pS\n", __func__, n->notifier_call); > > This is a great suggestion Xiaoming, much appreciated! I feel like reinventing the wheel here - with your idea, code was super clear and concise, very nice suggestion!! The only 2 things that diverge from your idea: I'm using '%ps' (not showing offsets) and also, kept the wording "(un)registered/calling", not using __func__ - I feel it's a bit odd in the output. OK for you? I'm definitely using your idea in V2 heh Cheers, Guilherme