From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16DCDDE25 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:03:38 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <18068.5706.700933.551828@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20070709195743.GA26089@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <200707092225.25287.arnd@arndb.de> <4692A5B8.9010702@freescale.com> <8CA741AA-D200-474F-943D-ECE4B3ACD38B@kernel.crashing.org> <18068.5706.700933.551828@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <89E626D4-D48D-4062-A996-E2DFFE8248E3@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow exec on 32-bit from readable, non-exec pages, with a warning. Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:03:24 +0200 To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> Yeah. Giving the warning is a good thing though. > > No, it isn't; it's just noise, if we're not ever going to do anything > to prevent the behaviour - and we can't. The same userland code will not run correctly on PPC64 or BookE systems. Is that not a reason to warn? Segher