linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] pseries/fadump: move out platform specific support from generic code
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:04:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a779e216bb088b33b022cd026bdb647e05aa338.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156149556436.9094.15834897273683011518.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 02:16 +0530, Hari Bathini wrote:
> Introduce callbacks for platform specific operations like register,
> unregister, invalidate & such, and move pseries specific code into
> platform code.

Please don't move around large blocks of code *and* change the code in
a single patch. It makes reviewing the changes extremely tedious since
the changes are mixed in with hundreds of lines of nothing.

> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h            |   75 ----
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump-common.h          |   38 ++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c                 |  500 ++-----------------------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile      |    1 
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c |  529 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.h |   96 +++++
>  6 files changed, 700 insertions(+), 539 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.h
> 

> +static struct fadump_ops pseries_fadump_ops = {
> +	.init_fadump_mem_struct	= pseries_init_fadump_mem_struct,
> +	.register_fadump	= pseries_register_fadump,

I realise you are just translating the existing interface, but why is
init_fadump_mem_struct() done as a seperate step and not as a part of
the registration function? The struct doesn't seem to be necessary
until the actual registration happens.

> +	.unregister_fadump	= pseries_unregister_fadump,
> +	.invalidate_fadump	= pseries_invalidate_fadump,
> +	.process_fadump		= pseries_process_fadump,
> +	.fadump_region_show	= pseries_fadump_region_show,

> +	.crash_fadump		= pseries_crash_fadump,

Rename this to fadump_trigger or something, it's not clear what it
does.




  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-03  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-25 20:45 [PATCH v3 00/16] Add FADump support on PowerNV platform Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] powerpc/fadump: move internal fadump code to a new file Hari Bathini
2019-06-28  4:55   ` Stewart Smith
2019-06-28  5:51     ` Hari Bathini
2019-07-03  3:30   ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-07-03 17:36     ` Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] powerpc/fadump: Improve fadump documentation Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] pseries/fadump: move out platform specific support from generic code Hari Bathini
2019-07-03  4:04   ` Oliver O'Halloran [this message]
2019-07-03 17:48     ` Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] powerpc/fadump: use FADump instead of fadump for how it is pronounced Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] powerpc/fadump: enable fadump support on OPAL based POWER platform Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] powerpc/fadump: Update documentation about OPAL platform support Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] powerpc/fadump: consider reserved ranges while reserving memory Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] powerpc/fadump: consider reserved ranges while releasing memory Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] powernv/fadump: process architected register state data provided by firmware Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] powernv/fadump: add support to preserve crash data on FADUMP disabled kernel Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] powerpc/fadump: update documentation about CONFIG_PRESERVE_FA_DUMP Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] powerpc/powernv: export /sys/firmware/opal/core for analysing opal crashes Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] powernv/fadump: Skip processing /proc/vmcore when only OPAL core exists Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] powernv/opalcore: provide an option to invalidate /sys/firmware/opal/core file Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] powernv/fadump: consider f/w load area Hari Bathini
2019-06-25 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] powernv/fadump: update documentation about option to release opalcore Hari Bathini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8a779e216bb088b33b022cd026bdb647e05aa338.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=ananth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hegdevasant@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=stewart@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).