From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE94CD5BD5 for ; Thu, 28 May 2026 07:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gQz0B1rCKz2xJT; Thu, 28 May 2026 17:39:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=113.46.200.217 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1779953978; cv=none; b=J5ERFwyaVwAVglb0mOpbKlxelR+mAu2zrhDdo7Rx8B7E9qslHELjvgk2XV8PspQufUHdostTaEMMyomxBrv4sS8Ouri+Dk4gNyJbqohtCl6UDEhi6YyoeYeSxuPuOfKdFHLq438WBwzmRocRV59TnZIgwEQ7uW5ndnZb3CT3nboV41Iv4+iXDYbZiy6YtCE+r7K5xOqMhHq4UVKJzr1Zmu8CeK/UdIfLkh6crW7mxUBzs/wj67l3E1ZyStreOLTY+GxwwINsowlHWO+3uy60ZbXfxCGBo6mB76C0dLUzFXQsyqeSaUAjatUteE6nxiZq3fSP5vjfFsdHzpLPySjz0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1779953978; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=u5ZL+hZHbV/pTWWeaWLQdg762ZQtOkbcULKixMOn0bQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jLy6f48+bU/6OHSCbJXFOjbIG1YhQntM/XLXSIctN5Id97jq5QNDJunL4eHWw64bv9q8zIy/g4m34UdRF3agEJuRIeBvZgjxnsElXrlNenlGUci1ZuI1x5oH7qObRnbeuMkw/LAHZoc6EDaRYAJAKV7Z/+TsZwHYF/Bx9TllGoeVgacJkfloUrZg42E6dDigqujk7llGGLkO6dDkJQHijfwcI0exn6DZ+qYYlyNlWlEtKA9T08mmTkDR0P7v97fatRa7KGBDszii8QGP/93Pf9iTXIvVtOorJcNj/PZnXASEZ0bepP29vCMy6hCHEIZDP3ImtRqX0Iqb/wz/3Dvb3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=1WB2GNzI; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=113.46.200.217; helo=canpmsgout02.his.huawei.com; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=1WB2GNzI; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=113.46.200.217; helo=canpmsgout02.his.huawei.com; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from canpmsgout02.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout02.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gQz093n2Qz2xHK for ; Thu, 28 May 2026 17:39:37 +1000 (AEST) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=u5ZL+hZHbV/pTWWeaWLQdg762ZQtOkbcULKixMOn0bQ=; b=1WB2GNzIiq2qfSiouaY2eBpNlTCp9CXSIQnP/DR+JRdUP9LOzMG39nBxhaSnx3i1EvTkk0koF MP95rV5mkYXdTAj5/1AL8Fatw2aQLMSIwUnEOl/84G4vPpz+9p58t8kHNA5P7Gcj6jk63HEJBED bJc80/B28puWomV5/AKUkWE= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.104]) by canpmsgout02.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4gQyq556rjzcb23; Thu, 28 May 2026 15:31:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B044056A; Thu, 28 May 2026 15:39:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.254] (10.67.109.254) by dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 28 May 2026 15:39:28 +0800 Message-ID: <8aaa1d2e-09cc-4d58-b90e-1869d1bf55b2@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 15:39:27 +0800 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 00/17] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation To: Mike Rapoport , Huacai Chen CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20260525084932.934910-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> From: Jinjie Ruan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.109.254] X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems100002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.206) To dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) On 5/25/2026 7:36 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi Huacai, > > On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 06:14:52PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: >> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 4:50 PM Jinjie Ruan wrote: >>> >>> Jinjie Ruan (16): >>> riscv: kexec_file: Fix crashk_low_res not exclude bug >>> powerpc/crash: Fix possible memory leak in update_crash_elfcorehdr() >>> arm64: kexec: Fix image->elf_headers memory leak during retry loop >>> x86/kexec: Fix potential buffer overflow in prepare_elf_headers() >>> arm64: kexec_file: Fix potential buffer overflow in >>> prepare_elf_headers() >>> riscv: kexec_file: Fix potential buffer overflow in >>> prepare_elf_headers() >>> LoongArch: kexec: Fix potential buffer overflow in >>> prepare_elf_headers() >>> crash: Add crash_prepare_headers() to exclude crash kernel memory >>> arm64: kexec_file: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code >>> x86/kexec: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code >>> riscv: kexec_file: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code >>> LoongArch: kexec: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code >>> crash: Use crash_exclude_core_ranges() on powerpc >>> arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation >>> riscv: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation >>> arm64/crash: Add crash hotplug support >> I have some bikesheedings about the subjects. Can we unify the prefix formats? >> x86/kexec, arm64: kexec_file, riscv: kexec_file, LoongArch: kexec ..... > > It might look weird in the series, but powerpc and x86 use '/' and arm64 and > riscv use ':' so in the logs in arch/ this would be actually fine. > > With the only exception of arm64/crash that should have been arm64: crash: Thanks, will update it in next version. > >> Huacai >