linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org
Cc: nathanl@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:01:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b36065d-e4b4-bc0c-cf69-f01c91e49061@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427150113.14368-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>

On 4/27/21 8:01 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> After a LPM, the device tree node ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory may be
> updated by the hypervisor in the case the NUMA topology of the LPAR's
> memory is updated.
> 
> This is caught by the kernel, but the memory's node is updated because
> there is no way to move a memory block between nodes.
> 
> If later a memory block is added or removed, drmem_update_dt() is called
> and it is overwriting the DT node to match the added or removed LMB. But
> the LMB's associativity node has not been updated after the DT node update
> and thus the node is overwritten by the Linux's topology instead of the
> hypervisor one.
> 
> Introduce a hook called when the ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory node is
> updated to force an update of the LMB's associativity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/drmem.h          |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c                   | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c |  9 +++++
>  3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/drmem.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/drmem.h
> index bf2402fed3e0..55c2c25085b0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/drmem.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/drmem.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ int drmem_update_dt(void);
>  int __init
>  walk_drmem_lmbs_early(unsigned long node, void *data,
>  		      int (*func)(struct drmem_lmb *, const __be32 **, void *));
> +void drmem_update_lmbs(void);
>  #endif
> 
>  static inline void invalidate_lmb_associativity_index(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c
> index 9af3832c9d8d..46074bdfdb3c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c
> @@ -307,6 +307,54 @@ int __init walk_drmem_lmbs_early(unsigned long node, void *data,
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * Update the LMB associativity index.
> + */
> +static int update_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *updated_lmb,
> +		      __maybe_unused const __be32 **usm,
> +		      __maybe_unused void *data)
> +{
> +	struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Brut force there may be better way to fetch the LMB
> +	 */
> +	for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
> +		if (lmb->drc_index != updated_lmb->drc_index)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		lmb->aa_index = updated_lmb->aa_index;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Update the LMB associativity index.
> + *
> + * This needs to be called when the hypervisor is updating the
> + * dynamic-reconfiguration-memory node property.
> + */
> +void drmem_update_lmbs(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	const __be32 *prop;
> +
> +	node = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory");
> +	if (!node)
> +		return;
> +
> +	prop = of_get_property(node, "ibm,dynamic-memory", NULL);
> +	if (prop) {
> +		__walk_drmem_v1_lmbs(prop, NULL, NULL, update_lmb);
> +	} else {
> +		prop = of_get_property(node, "ibm,dynamic-memory-v2", NULL);
> +		if (prop)
> +			__walk_drmem_v2_lmbs(prop, NULL, NULL, update_lmb);
> +	}
> +
> +	of_node_put(node);
> +}
>  #endif
> 
>  static int init_drmem_lmb_size(struct device_node *dn)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> index ea4d6a660e0d..c68eccc6e8df 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> 
>  #include <asm/machdep.h>
>  #include <asm/rtas.h>
> +#include <asm/drmem.h>
>  #include "pseries.h"
>  #include "../../kernel/cacheinfo.h"
> 
> @@ -237,6 +238,7 @@ int pseries_devicetree_update(s32 scope)
>  	__be32 *data;
>  	int update_nodes_token;
>  	int rc;
> +	bool drmem_updated = false;
> 
>  	update_nodes_token = rtas_token("ibm,update-nodes");
>  	if (update_nodes_token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> @@ -271,6 +273,10 @@ int pseries_devicetree_update(s32 scope)
>  					continue;
>  				}
> 
> +				if (!strcmp(np->full_name,
> +					    "ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory"))
> +					drmem_updated = true;

Is there a reason that we can't use the existing pseries_memory_notifier()
callback in pseries/hotplug-memory.c to trigger the drmem_update_lmbs() when
either the ibm,dynamic-memory or ibm,dynamic-memory-v2 properties are updated?

Something like:

static int pseries_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
                                   unsigned long action, void *data)
{
        struct of_reconfig_data *rd = data;
        int err = 0;

        switch (action) {
        case OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE:
                err = pseries_add_mem_node(rd->dn);
                break;
        case OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE:
                err = pseries_remove_mem_node(rd->dn);
                break;
	case OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY:
		if (!strcmp(rd->dn->full_name, "ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory"));
			drmem_update_lmbs(rd->prop);
		break;
        }
        return notifier_from_errno(err);
}

Your drmem_update_lmbs() would need to be updated to take a property and to
check the property name against ibm,dyanmic-memory[-v2].

-Tyrel

> +
>  				switch (action) {
>  				case DELETE_DT_NODE:
>  					delete_dt_node(np);
> @@ -293,6 +299,9 @@ int pseries_devicetree_update(s32 scope)
>  	} while (rc == 1);
> 
>  	kfree(rtas_buf);
> +
> +	if (drmem_updated)
> +		drmem_update_lmbs();
>  	return rc;
>  }
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-27 15:01 [PATCH] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM Laurent Dufour
2021-04-27 17:01 ` Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
2021-04-27 17:28   ` Laurent Dufour
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-27 18:13 Laurent Dufour
2021-04-27 18:17 ` Laurent Dufour
2021-04-27 19:37 ` Tyrel Datwyler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b36065d-e4b4-bc0c-cf69-f01c91e49061@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).