From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E3AC46467 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nspvp2W5nz3cCD for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:51:02 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WwWjzPKH; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ajd@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WwWjzPKH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nsptj00j3z3c3m for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:50:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30C0V8Hb009190; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:58 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=Klto9JkBt9PPUjfruHG/wFOzNRERs3rUrt0aeJ+aB8k=; b=WwWjzPKH95mS+0MIMVYya1R5Q5xcKHVsryJZ6M0abVoAk/bP0KZrKy5ZIqjRokjhY69H tSioYQAbblGv52LUUx0PDxUJGD1GSYx/gzZ2VVk9CGBVw8mVH5NgEPk/PPXQYghpO82i 8T7ZWDjtlpkZNxmTulLj1ZsXGORszuoVEbthvhOkwhPcfCvbO8hdS+NBbFa+nWx9/0nS eh2mP54hMMRxnifq/vkyeutZW1B/riDeWkXFDaYrqHsdW0v8hMNqwbLOtTCQ8QfZFmRA o+PHr2u0R7Ls3EIuVbnD29dhN5qWATtZR2q5VhE52F4/2lkDLGSAVtNJC9/mCmYq58PO Vw== Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n27qt2a9e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:58 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30BCrHKn004503; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:56 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n1kkysqvu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:56 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30C2nrNo47514022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:53 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD7D20043; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E27120040; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:49:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.192.255.228] (unknown [9.192.255.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A308E6010C; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:49:49 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <8c81e91c687c6a9d6a57ab3a0b61717d8b0b1f5e.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/secvar: Use u64 in secvar_operations From: Andrew Donnellan To: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:49:40 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20230112023819.1692452-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> References: <20230112023819.1692452-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.3 (3.46.3-1.fc37) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: yDqm-NG7dHp4EL4Bk96fQu86l8tQr8FK X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: yDqm-NG7dHp4EL4Bk96fQu86l8tQr8FK X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.923,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-11_10,2023-01-11_03,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=670 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301120015 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 13:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > There's no reason for secvar_operations to use uint64_t vs the more > common kernel type u64. >=20 > The types are compatible, but they require different printk format > strings which can lead to confusion. >=20 > Change all the secvar related routines to use u64. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan --=20 Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited