linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, danielwa@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] cmdline: Gives architectures opportunity to use generically defined boot cmdline manipulation
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:18:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8db81511-3f28-4ef1-5e66-188cf7cafad1@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303175747.GD19713@willie-the-truck>



Le 03/03/2021 à 18:57, Will Deacon a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:25:22PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Most architectures have similar boot command line manipulation
>> options. This patchs adds the definition in init/Kconfig, gated by
>> CONFIG_HAVE_CMDLINE that the architectures can select to use them.
>>
>> In order to use this, a few architectures will have to change their
>> CONFIG options:
>> - riscv has to replace CMDLINE_FALLBACK by CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER
>> - architectures using CONFIG_CMDLINE_OVERRIDE or
>> CONFIG_CMDLINE_OVERWRITE have to replace them by CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE.
>>
>> Architectures also have to define CONFIG_DEFAULT_CMDLINE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
>> ---
>>   init/Kconfig | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
>> index 22946fe5ded9..a0f2ad9467df 100644
>> --- a/init/Kconfig
>> +++ b/init/Kconfig
>> @@ -117,6 +117,62 @@ config INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT
>>   	  Maximum of each of the number of arguments and environment
>>   	  variables passed to init from the kernel command line.
>>   
>> +config HAVE_CMDLINE
>> +	bool
>> +
>> +config CMDLINE_BOOL
>> +	bool "Default bootloader kernel arguments"
>> +	depends on HAVE_CMDLINE
>> +	help
>> +	  On some platforms, there is currently no way for the boot loader to
>> +	  pass arguments to the kernel. For these platforms, you can supply
>> +	  some command-line options at build time by entering them here.  In
>> +	  most cases you will need to specify the root device here.
> 
> Why is this needed as well as CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER? IIUC, the latter
> will use CONFIG_CMDLINE if it fails to get anything from the bootloader,
> which sounds like the same scenario.
> 
>> +config CMDLINE
>> +	string "Initial kernel command string"
> 
> s/Initial/Default
> 
> which is then consistent with the rest of the text here.
> 
>> +	depends on CMDLINE_BOOL
> 
> Ah, so this is a bit different and I don't think lines-up with the
> CMDLINE_BOOL help text.
> 
>> +	default DEFAULT_CMDLINE
>> +	help
>> +	  On some platforms, there is currently no way for the boot loader to
>> +	  pass arguments to the kernel. For these platforms, you can supply
>> +	  some command-line options at build time by entering them here.  In
>> +	  most cases you will need to specify the root device here.
> 
> (same stale text)
> 
>> +choice
>> +	prompt "Kernel command line type" if CMDLINE != ""
>> +	default CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER
>> +	help
>> +	  Selects the way you want to use the default kernel arguments.
> 
> How about:
> 
> "Determines how the default kernel arguments are combined with any
>   arguments passed by the bootloader"
> 
>> +config CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER
>> +	bool "Use bootloader kernel arguments if available"
>> +	help
>> +	  Uses the command-line options passed by the boot loader. If
>> +	  the boot loader doesn't provide any, the default kernel command
>> +	  string provided in CMDLINE will be used.
>> +
>> +config CMDLINE_EXTEND
> 
> Can we rename this to CMDLINE_APPEND, please? There is code in the tree
> which disagrees about what CMDLINE_EXTEND means, so that will need be
> to be updated to be consistent (e.g. the EFI stub parsing order). Having
> the generic option with a different name means we won't accidentally end
> up with the same inconsistent behaviours.

Argh, yes. Seems like the problem is even larger than that IIUC:

- For ARM it means to append the bootloader arguments to the CONFIG_CMDLINE
- For Powerpc it means to append the CONFIG_CMDLINE to the bootloader arguments
- For SH  it means to append the CONFIG_CMDLINE to the bootloader arguments
- For EFI it means to append the bootloader arguments to the CONFIG_CMDLINE
- For OF it means to append the CONFIG_CMDLINE to the bootloader arguments

So what happens on ARM for instance when it selects CONFIG_OF for instance ?
Or should we consider that EXTEND means APPEND or PREPEND, no matter which ?
Because EXTEND is for instance used for:

	config INITRAMFS_FORCE
		bool "Ignore the initramfs passed by the bootloader"
		depends on CMDLINE_EXTEND || CMDLINE_FORCE


Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02 17:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] Improve boot command line handling Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] cmdline: Add generic function to build command line Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 17:28   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-03 17:38     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 17:46       ` Will Deacon
2021-03-03 17:57         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 18:16           ` Will Deacon
2021-03-05 11:58             ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-05 12:49               ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-05 18:35                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-03-05 18:33               ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-03-03 17:39   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drivers: of: use cmdline building function Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] powerpc: convert to generic builtin command line Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] cmdline: Add capability to prepend the " Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 18:19   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] powerpc: add capability to prepend default " Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] cmdline: Gives architectures opportunity to use generically defined boot cmdline manipulation Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 19:30   ` kernel test robot
2021-03-03 17:57   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-25 11:18     ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-03-25 19:32       ` Will Deacon
2021-03-26  6:18         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-26  6:44     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] powerpc: use generic CMDLINE manipulations Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Improve boot command line handling Daniel Walker
2021-03-02 17:39   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03  2:01   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-03 17:39     ` Daniel Walker
2021-03-03 18:07       ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 18:53         ` Daniel Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8db81511-3f28-4ef1-5e66-188cf7cafad1@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us \
    --cc=danielwa@cisco.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).