From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465DC43441 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 11:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE632086B for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 11:16:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BBE632086B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4329bT4K7rzDqWt for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 22:16:05 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=anshuman.khandual@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4329XZ4NVxzDqW0 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 22:13:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F6A3898; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 03:13:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.163.1.117] (unknown [10.163.1.117]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55D4F3F5AF; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 03:13:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Replace all open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODE To: Andrew Morton References: <1542966856-12619-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20181123154415.42898a42e28a31488749738a@linux-foundation.org> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <8e16e9d1-8f64-d2ca-7d06-985ce601f75b@arm.com> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 16:43:15 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181123154415.42898a42e28a31488749738a@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: hverkuil@xs4all.nl, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, jiangqi903@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 11/24/2018 05:14 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:24:16 +0530 Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> At present there are multiple places where invalid node number is encoded >> as -1. Even though implicitly understood it is always better to have macros >> in there. Replace these open encodings for an invalid node number with the >> global macro NUMA_NO_NODE. This helps remove NUMA related assumptions like >> 'invalid node' from various places redirecting them to a common definition. >> >> ... >> >> Build tested this with multiple cross compiler options like alpha, sparc, >> arm64, x86, powerpc, powerpc64le etc with their default config which might >> not have compiled tested all driver related changes. I will appreciate >> folks giving this a test in their respective build environment. >> >> All these places for replacement were found by running the following grep >> patterns on the entire kernel code. Please let me know if this might have >> missed some instances. This might also have replaced some false positives. >> I will appreciate suggestions, inputs and review. >> >> 1. git grep "nid == -1" >> 2. git grep "node == -1" >> 3. git grep "nid = -1" >> 4. git grep "node = -1" > > The build testing is good, but I worry that some of the affected files > don't clearly have numa.h in their include paths, for the NUMA_NO_NODE > definition. > > The first thing I looked it is arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h. > Maybe it somehow manages to include numa.h via some nested include, but > if so, is that reliable across all config combinations and as code > evolves? > > So I think that the patch should have added an explicit include of > numa.h, especially in cases where the affected file previously had no > references to any of the things which numa.h defines. Fair enough. Will include numa.h in those particular files.