From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmcore: allow alternate dump capturing methods to export vmcore without is_kdump_kernel()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 20:04:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fcd7ba7-0f27-7bbc-676f-7e13c8bf00d7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPP/UeP1zUbGPzrt@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Hi Baoquan,
Thanks for the review...
On 03/09/23 9:06 am, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Hari,
>
> On 09/02/23 at 12:34am, Hari Bathini wrote:
>> Currently, is_kdump_kernel() returns true when elfcorehdr_addr is set.
>> While elfcorehdr_addr is set for kexec based kernel dump mechanism,
>> alternate dump capturing methods like fadump [1] also set it to export
>> the vmcore. is_kdump_kernel() is used to restrict resources in crash
>> dump capture kernel but such restrictions may not be desirable for
>> fadump. Allow is_kdump_kernel() to be defined differently for such
>> scenarios. With this, is_kdump_kernel() could be false while vmcore
>> is usable. So, introduce is_crashdump_kernel() to return true when
>> elfcorehdr_addr is set and use it for vmcore related checks.
>
> I got what is done in these two patches, but didn't get why they need be
> done. vmcore_unusable()/is_vmcore_usable() are only unitilized in ia64.
> Why do you care if it's is_crashdump_kernel() or is_kdump_kernel()?
> If you want to override the generic is_kdump_kernel() with powerpc's own
> is_kdump_kernel(), your below change is enough to allow you to do that.
> I can't see why is_crashdump_kernel() is needed. Could you explain that
> specifically?
You mean to just remove is_kdump_kernel() check in is_vmcore_usable() &
vmcore_unusable() functions? Replaced generic is_crashdump_kernel()
function instead, that returns true for any dump capturing method,
irrespective of whether is_kdump_kernel() returns true or false.
For fadump case, is_kdump_kernel() will return false after patch 2/2.
Thanks
Hari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-04 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 19:04 [PATCH 1/2] vmcore: allow alternate dump capturing methods to export vmcore without is_kdump_kernel() Hari Bathini
2023-09-01 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/fadump: make is_kdump_kernel() return false when fadump is active Hari Bathini
2023-09-03 3:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] vmcore: allow alternate dump capturing methods to export vmcore without is_kdump_kernel() Baoquan He
2023-09-04 14:34 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2023-09-05 2:30 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-05 19:25 ` Hari Bathini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fcd7ba7-0f27-7bbc-676f-7e13c8bf00d7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).