From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3FC34021 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B0020801 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:22:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 40B0020801 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kaod.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Lnm553YrzDqfK for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:22:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kaod.org (client-ip=188.165.48.182; helo=7.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net; envelope-from=clg@kaod.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kaod.org Received: from 7.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net (7.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net [188.165.48.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Lnjx644QzDqbg for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:20:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from player730.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.110.115.178]) by mo2.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7D61C9188 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:20:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from kaod.org (deibp9eh1--blueice1n4.emea.ibm.com [195.212.29.166]) (Authenticated sender: clg@kaod.org) by player730.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C715FF4F826F; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: QEMU/KVM snapshot restore bug To: dftxbs3e , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Greg Kurz References: <7544eb90-71a6-3709-c530-9c83beb943a7@free.fr> <06cc1954-9bf5-0178-668e-130411ea1b13@kaod.org> <49161ca3-941a-4f8b-f0ef-cce49ab0f9cd@free.fr> From: =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= Message-ID: <90b5fff0-45dc-9722-db81-2ade45b5aebd@kaod.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:20:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49161ca3-941a-4f8b-f0ef-cce49ab0f9cd@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 12626404506230819737 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjeeigdejiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepveorughrihgtpgfnvggpifhorghtvghruceotghlgheskhgrohgurdhorhhgqeenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpudelhedrvdduvddrvdelrdduieeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepphhlrgihvghrjeeftddrhhgrrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtlhhgsehkrghougdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigphhptgdquggvvheslhhishhtshdrohiilhgrsghsrdhorhhg X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2/17/20 3:48 AM, dftxbs3e wrote: > On 2/16/20 7:16 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: >> >> I think this is fixed by commit f55750e4e4fb ("spapr/xive: Mask the EAS when >> allocating an IRQ") which is not in QEMU 4.1.1. The same problem should also >> occur with LE guests. >> >> Could you possibly regenerate the QEMU rpm with this patch ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> C. > > Hello! > > I applied the patch and reinstalled the RPM then tried to restore the > snapshot I created previously and it threw the same error. > > Do I need to re-create the snapshot and/or restart the machine? yes. The problem is at the source. > I have > important workloads running so that'll be possible only in a few days if > needed. OK. Thanks, C.