From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BC8DDE2C for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:31:14 +1000 (EST) From: Michael Neuling To: mjw@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: Resend: [PATCH] oprofile support for Power 5++ In-reply-to: <4693E7EF.4020708@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4693CC5B.4020207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <14287.1184096639@neuling.org> <4693E7EF.4020708@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:31:38 -0500 Message-ID: <911.1184099498@neuling.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > > > Does it make more sense to call this "ppc64/power5+rev3"? > > > This is a change to support new counter setup for oprofile. It may be the > same if there is a revision 4 or 5 etc. So since the internal name was ++ > I followed that convention. I'm not too fussed, but if rev 4 comes out, the counters change and we need power5+++, it's gonna look pretty silly :-) Mikey