linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] s390: Fix vDSO clock_getres()
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:21:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9121e8d2-65d2-2b96-1b69-0047d62dc308@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904031205460.1967@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>


On 03/04/2019 11:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> 
>> On Mon,  1 Apr 2019 12:51:50 +0100
>> Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> clock_getres in the vDSO library has to preserve the same behaviour
>>> of posix_get_hrtimer_res().
>>>
>>> In particular, posix_get_hrtimer_res() does:
>>>     sec = 0;
>>>     ns = hrtimer_resolution;
>>> and hrtimer_resolution depends on the enablement of the high
>>> resolution timers that can happen either at compile or at run time.
>>>
>>> Fix the s390 vdso implementation of clock_getres keeping a copy of
>>> hrtimer_resolution in vdso data and using that directly.
>>>
>>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/s390/include/asm/vdso.h           |  1 +
>>>  arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c         |  2 +-
>>>  arch/s390/kernel/time.c                |  1 +
>>>  arch/s390/kernel/vdso32/clock_getres.S | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>>>  arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/clock_getres.S | 15 ++++++++++-----
>>>  5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> I tried this patch and in principle this works. In that regard
>> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>>
>> But I wonder if the loop to check the update counter is really
>> necessary. The hrtimer_resolution value can only changes once with
>> the first call to hrtimer_switch_to_hres(). With the TOD clock
>> as the only clock available on s390 we always have the ability
>> to do hrtimer. It then all depends on the highres=[on|off] kernel
>> parameter what value we get with clock_getres().
> 
> Yes, it's not changing after boot anymore.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> 

Ok, I will remove the loop from both the implementations and post it with v2.

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-01 11:51 [PATCH 0/5] Fix vDSO clock_getres() Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-15 17:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-04-16 12:42     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-16 14:23       ` Will Deacon
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-02  5:54   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-04-02  9:00     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-02  6:14   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-04-02  9:01     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-03  9:38   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-03 10:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-03 14:21       ` Vincenzo Frascino [this message]
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] nds32: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO selftest to clock_getres Vincenzo Frascino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9121e8d2-65d2-2b96-1b69-0047d62dc308@arm.com \
    --to=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=deanbo422@gmail.com \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).