From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5F6C433F5 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Hzlxx1r2Pz3bP7 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:57:09 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=E/pte9+S; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com (client-ip=46.235.227.227; helo=bhuna.collabora.co.uk; envelope-from=andrealmeid@collabora.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=E/pte9+S; dkim-atps=neutral X-Greylist: delayed 9294 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:56:27 AEDT Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hzlx73jRmz2ymc for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:56:25 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id 57F7C1F45BC8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1637769382; bh=zz/xw7PsWQON9rmJZojHTBxXbF24yxYHqhaUVP88TKs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=E/pte9+S/xU8DdTZ/vKpNhA3ylTQYBGSinvyN6mt+xZdQFKKHEb6Mmt84KbEzM5mZ OSPyhJ6sCmssRkBBHimK6onWi+F/fiAA5Ypad79m+N+kkn6BrMI3wqjRnjC5w47i2Q aPNdfcTSLCdquNNhzIMYwK9OlGuMqJafLR38PMnBjrRL+zm9bD++8vMrP9KIyqazlB tbunQevunpoo7PovcVIzyk1G/rHktU5H9JEaZdZEpb0Db+mq5nCjz2SQfKauqW6Gl0 yoYNuJa5aw5Hl9JNwgtzD1fRyYNxpu0YlbF5Voaz4iL2LRbsvhzZ/6BwDUd1b2lpYs 25pmRI9iK1Hpw== Message-ID: <91a64059-f301-4812-56ea-38755ccae5d7@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:56:09 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall Content-Language: en-US To: Arnd Bergmann References: <20211124132112.11641-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux-sh list , Peter Zijlstra , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Max Filippov , Mike Galbraith , sparclinux , Will Deacon , Stephen Rothwell , Yoshinori Sato , Sergey Senozhatsky , Naresh Kamboju , Linux-Next Mailing List , Geert Uytterhoeven , Waiman Long , "open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT \(xtensa\)" , Boqun Feng , linux-m68k , Ingo Molnar , Chris Zankel , Michal Simek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim , Rob Landley , alpha , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , David Miller Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Às 11:29 de 24/11/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida wrote: >> >> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs. >> >> Signed-off-by: André Almeida > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann > > I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific > hacks, and that the list above is complete. Thanks! > > Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it > through the > tip tree? > I think that adding it to asm-generic tree make sense to me.