From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/4xx: Fix setup_kuep() on SMP
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:06:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <920c4c49-5185-a0d5-0ab2-484effc307cc@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tulg7uh6.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Le 29/06/2021 à 13:58, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>> On SMP, setup_kuep() is also called from start_secondary() since
>> commit 86f46f343272 ("powerpc/32s: Initialise KUAP and KUEP in C").
>>
>> start_secondary() is not an __init function.
>>
>> Remove the __init marker from setup_kuep() and bail out when
>> not caller on the first CPU as the work is already done.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Fixes: 10248dcba120 ("powerpc/44x: Implement Kernel Userspace Exec Protection (KUEP)")
>> Fixes: 86f46f343272 ("powerpc/32s: Initialise KUAP and KUEP in C").
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c
>> index 7da6d1e9fc9b..20c18bd5b9a0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c
>> @@ -241,8 +241,11 @@ void __init mmu_init_secondary(int cpu)
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_KUEP
>> -void __init setup_kuep(bool disabled)
>> +void setup_kuep(bool disabled)
>> {
>> + if (smp_processor_id() != boot_cpuid)
>> + return;
>> +
>> if (disabled)
>> patch_instruction_site(&patch__tlb_44x_kuep, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP()));
>> else
>
> Building ppc44x_defconfig gives me:
>
> /linux/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c: In function 'setup_kuep':
> /linux/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c:246:35: error: 'boot_cpuid' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'boot_cpu_init'?
> 246 | if (smp_processor_id() != boot_cpuid)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> | boot_cpu_init
> /linux/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c:246:35: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
Seems like we need <asm/smp.h> when we don't have CONFIG_SMP.
I tested it with akebono_defconfig, looks like it has CONFIG_SMP.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-28 6:56 [PATCH] powerpc/4xx: Fix setup_kuep() on SMP Christophe Leroy
2021-06-29 11:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-29 12:06 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=920c4c49-5185-a0d5-0ab2-484effc307cc@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox