linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: david.hagood@gmail.com
To: "Scott Wood" <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>,
	david.hagood@gmail.com,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Questions on interrupt vector assignment on MPC8641D
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:55:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <942ea2f3464025464521511c32355782.squirrel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011121745.2e471fc0@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net>


> There's mpic stuff in the call trace, so the NULL host was OK.
>
> Look in arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/pic.c.  What is the second-to-last
> parameter of mpc86xx_init_irq() in your kernel tree?  It's 256 in
> current upstream -- this is the number of IRQ sources the MPIC driver
> will handle.
>

One, thanks for your help - I do appreciate it.

In the tree I am working from, the call to mpc86xx_init_irq() function is
in a BSP file (ep8641a.c), and the line was

 mpic1 = mpic_alloc(np, res.start,
			MPIC_PRIMARY | MPIC_WANTS_RESET | MPIC_BIG_ENDIAN,
			16, NR_IRQS-4,
			" MPIC     ");

I tried changing that to
mpic1 = mpic_alloc(np, res.start,
			MPIC_PRIMARY | MPIC_WANTS_RESET | MPIC_BIG_ENDIAN,
			16, 256,
			" MPIC     ");

With no meaningful changes.

I wonder about the next lines:


	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 0, res.start + 0x10000);

	/* 48 Internal Interrupts */
	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 1, res.start + 0x10200);
	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 2, res.start + 0x10400);
	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 3, res.start + 0x10600);

	/* 16 External interrupts
	 * Moving them from [0 - 15] to [64 - 79]
	 */
	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 4, res.start + 0x10000);


Looking at the code, and where it appears to be faulting, it looks like
its in kernel/irq/chip.c:


int set_irq_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
{
	struct irq_desc *desc;
	unsigned long flags;
	int ret = -ENXIO;

	if (irq >= NR_IRQS) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "Trying to set irq type for IRQ%d\n", irq);
		return -ENODEV;
	}

	desc = irq_desc + irq;
------------------------
	if (desc->chip->set_type) {
		spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
		ret = desc->chip->set_type(irq, type);
------------------------


		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
	}
	return ret;
}

My conjecture is that desc->chip isn't set. Is mpic_assign_isu the
function that does that?

(yes, I know - update your kernel. I am 2 weeks from a delivery, I have to
merge driver changes to sRIO in along with all of this....)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-12 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-21 14:12 Questions on interrupt vector assignment on MPC8641D david.hagood
2010-09-21 21:37 ` Anderson, Trevor
2010-09-21 22:07   ` Scott Wood
2010-09-22  0:36     ` Chen, Tiejun
2010-10-07 20:12     ` david.hagood
2010-10-07 20:26       ` Scott Wood
2010-10-07 21:01         ` david.hagood
2010-10-09 15:52         ` david.hagood
2010-10-11  9:51           ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-11 11:30             ` David Hagood
2010-10-11 14:44             ` david.hagood
2010-10-13  1:10               ` Michael Ellerman
2010-10-11 15:51             ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12  1:39               ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-11 15:50           ` Scott Wood
2010-10-11 17:02             ` david.hagood
2010-10-11 17:30               ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12  3:11                 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-09 17:03         ` david.hagood
2010-10-11  9:55           ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-11 17:17             ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 20:55               ` david.hagood [this message]
2010-10-12 21:21                 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-13  1:17                   ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-13 15:28                     ` Scott Wood
2010-10-13 17:08                       ` david.hagood
2010-10-13 19:56                         ` Scott Wood
2010-10-13 21:16                           ` david.hagood
2010-10-14  1:39                       ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-14  3:27                         ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-14 15:51                           ` Scott Wood
2010-10-14 16:22                             ` david.hagood
2010-10-14 16:32                               ` Scott Wood
2010-10-14 17:20                                 ` david.hagood
2010-10-14 17:50                                   ` Scott Wood
2010-10-14 18:44                                     ` david.hagood
2010-10-15  1:28                             ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-12  3:00             ` tiejun.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=942ea2f3464025464521511c32355782.squirrel@localhost \
    --to=david.hagood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).