linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/ptrace: simplify gpr_get/tm_cgpr_get
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:16:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94c56c46-e336-f61c-3623-1b2014fcbb2e@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119160221.GA5188@redhat.com>



Le 19/11/2020 à 17:02, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
> gpr_get() does membuf_write() twice to override pt_regs->msr in between.

Is there anything wrong with that ?

> We can call membuf_write() once and change ->msr in the kernel buffer,
> this simplifies the code and the next fix.
> 
> The patch adds a new simple helper, membuf_at(offs), it returns the new
> membuf which can be safely used after membuf_write().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c   | 13 +++++--------
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 13 +++++--------
>   include/linux/regset.h                   | 12 ++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c
> index 54f2d076206f..f8fcbd85d4cb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ int tm_cgpr_active(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset)
>   int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
>   		struct membuf to)
>   {
> +	struct membuf to_msr = membuf_at(&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
> +
>   	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_TM))
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
> @@ -97,17 +99,12 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
>   	flush_altivec_to_thread(target);
>   
>   	membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs,
> -			offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
> -	membuf_store(&to, get_user_ckpt_msr(target));
> +				sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));

This looks mis-aligned. But it should fit on a single line, now we allow up to 100 chars on a line.

>   
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) !=
> -		     offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long));
> +	membuf_store(&to_msr, get_user_ckpt_msr(target));
>   
> -	membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs.orig_gpr3,
> -			sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) -
> -			offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3));
>   	return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -
> -			sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
> +				sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));

I can't see any change here except the alignment. Can you leave it as is ?


>   }
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> index 7e6478e7ed07..39686ede40b3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ int ptrace_put_reg(struct task_struct *task, int regno, unsigned long data)
>   static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
>   		   struct membuf to)
>   {
> +	struct membuf to_msr = membuf_at(&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
>   	int i;
>   
>   	if (target->thread.regs == NULL)
> @@ -228,17 +229,13 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
>   			target->thread.regs->gpr[i] = NV_REG_POISON;
>   	}
>   
> -	membuf_write(&to, target->thread.regs, offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
> -	membuf_store(&to, get_user_msr(target));
> +	membuf_write(&to, target->thread.regs,
> +				sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));

This should fit on a single line.

>   
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) !=
> -		     offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long));
> +	membuf_store(&to_msr, get_user_msr(target));
>   
> -	membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,
> -			sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) -
> -			offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3));
>   	return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -
> -				 sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
> +				sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));

This should not change, it's not part of the changes for this patch.

>   }
>   
>   static int gpr_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> diff --git a/include/linux/regset.h b/include/linux/regset.h
> index c3403f328257..a00765f0e8cf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/regset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/regset.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size)
>   	return s->left;
>   }
>   
> +static inline struct membuf membuf_at(const struct membuf *s, size_t offs)
> +{
> +	struct membuf n = *s;

Is there any point in using a struct membuf * instaed of a struct membuf as parameter ?

> +
> +	if (offs > n.left)
> +		offs = n.left;
> +	n.p += offs;
> +	n.left -= offs;
> +
> +	return n;
> +}
> +
>   /* current s->p must be aligned for v; v must be a scalar */
>   #define membuf_store(s, v)				\
>   ({							\
> 

Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-19 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/2] powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/ptrace: simplify gpr_get/tm_cgpr_get Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 17:16   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-11-19 18:18     ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 16:05   ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 17:18   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-19 21:10   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-19 22:43     ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-23 18:01       ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-24  0:53         ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-19 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Christophe Leroy
2020-11-19 18:22   ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-12-10 11:30 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94c56c46-e336-f61c-3623-1b2014fcbb2e@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).