From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/ptrace: simplify gpr_get/tm_cgpr_get
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:16:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94c56c46-e336-f61c-3623-1b2014fcbb2e@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119160221.GA5188@redhat.com>
Le 19/11/2020 à 17:02, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
> gpr_get() does membuf_write() twice to override pt_regs->msr in between.
Is there anything wrong with that ?
> We can call membuf_write() once and change ->msr in the kernel buffer,
> this simplifies the code and the next fix.
>
> The patch adds a new simple helper, membuf_at(offs), it returns the new
> membuf which can be safely used after membuf_write().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 13 +++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 13 +++++--------
> include/linux/regset.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c
> index 54f2d076206f..f8fcbd85d4cb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ int tm_cgpr_active(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset)
> int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> struct membuf to)
> {
> + struct membuf to_msr = membuf_at(&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
> +
> if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_TM))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -97,17 +99,12 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> flush_altivec_to_thread(target);
>
> membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs,
> - offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
> - membuf_store(&to, get_user_ckpt_msr(target));
> + sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
This looks mis-aligned. But it should fit on a single line, now we allow up to 100 chars on a line.
>
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) !=
> - offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long));
> + membuf_store(&to_msr, get_user_ckpt_msr(target));
>
> - membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs.orig_gpr3,
> - sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) -
> - offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3));
> return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -
> - sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
> + sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
I can't see any change here except the alignment. Can you leave it as is ?
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> index 7e6478e7ed07..39686ede40b3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ int ptrace_put_reg(struct task_struct *task, int regno, unsigned long data)
> static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> struct membuf to)
> {
> + struct membuf to_msr = membuf_at(&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
> int i;
>
> if (target->thread.regs == NULL)
> @@ -228,17 +229,13 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> target->thread.regs->gpr[i] = NV_REG_POISON;
> }
>
> - membuf_write(&to, target->thread.regs, offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr));
> - membuf_store(&to, get_user_msr(target));
> + membuf_write(&to, target->thread.regs,
> + sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
This should fit on a single line.
>
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) !=
> - offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long));
> + membuf_store(&to_msr, get_user_msr(target));
>
> - membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,
> - sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) -
> - offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3));
> return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -
> - sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
> + sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
This should not change, it's not part of the changes for this patch.
> }
>
> static int gpr_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> diff --git a/include/linux/regset.h b/include/linux/regset.h
> index c3403f328257..a00765f0e8cf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/regset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/regset.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size)
> return s->left;
> }
>
> +static inline struct membuf membuf_at(const struct membuf *s, size_t offs)
> +{
> + struct membuf n = *s;
Is there any point in using a struct membuf * instaed of a struct membuf as parameter ?
> +
> + if (offs > n.left)
> + offs = n.left;
> + n.p += offs;
> + n.left -= offs;
> +
> + return n;
> +}
> +
> /* current s->p must be aligned for v; v must be a scalar */
> #define membuf_store(s, v) \
> ({ \
>
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/2] powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/ptrace: simplify gpr_get/tm_cgpr_get Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 17:16 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-11-19 18:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 16:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-19 17:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-19 21:10 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-19 22:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-23 18:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-11-24 0:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-19 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Christophe Leroy
2020-11-19 18:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-12-10 11:30 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94c56c46-e336-f61c-3623-1b2014fcbb2e@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).