From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Michael Neuling To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc,kexec: Speedup kexec hpte tear down In-reply-to: <20100512010003.GB3548@drongo> References: <20100511062826.E1C49D3340@localhost.localdomain> <1273561463.9209.138.camel@concordia> <30983.1273620594@neuling.org> <1273624565.5738.8.camel@concordia> <7247.1273624988@neuling.org> <20100512010003.GB3548@drongo> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:06:58 +1000 Message-ID: <9537.1273626418@neuling.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > We probably only do the remove on < 1% of the hptes now. So I doubt we > > would get a speedup since most of the time we aren't do the remove > > anymore. > > It would be nice to have some actual numbers. Could you add some > counters and print the results at the end? (Or don't you have any > way to print things at that stage?) Printing is hard at that point but I think we can do it. I'll try to when I get some time. A heavily loaded system which kdumps will need a lot more hptes removes than kexec, so stats for both these cases might be useful also. Mikey