From: christophe lombard <clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com, andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ocxl: Fix access to the AFU Descriptor Data
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 14:22:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <954aa561-0eeb-db87-42f7-56c11f967a9d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87in4dljch.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Le 14/08/2018 à 05:26, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Hi Christophe,
>
> The patch looks fine, just a nit about the change log:
>
> Christophe Lombard <clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> The AFU Information DVSEC capability is a means to extract common,
>> general information about all of the AFUs associated with a Function
>> independent of the specific functionality that each AFU provides.
>>
>> This patch fixes the access to the AFU Descriptor Data indexed by the
>> AFU Info Index field.
>
>> Fixes: 5ef3166e8a32 ("ocxl: Driver code for 'generic' opencapi devices")
>> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.16
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lombard <clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> When fixing a bug it's always good to describe how the bug manifests.
> ie. in this case we are clearly writing to the wrong location in config
> space, but what is the consequence of that? Does it kill the device, or
> just fails to initialise something correctly? How could I tell if I'm
> hitting this bug currently? How would I tell if the fix is applied
> correctly?
You are right, let me send a new version.
Thanks
>
> cheers
>
>> ---
>> Changelog[v2]
>> - Rebase to latest upstream.
>> - Use pci_write_config_byte instead of pci_write_config_word
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
>> index 2e30de9..57a6bb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
>> @@ -280,7 +280,9 @@ int ocxl_config_check_afu_index(struct pci_dev *dev,
>> u32 val;
>> int rc, templ_major, templ_minor, len;
>>
>> - pci_write_config_word(dev, fn->dvsec_afu_info_pos, afu_idx);
>> + pci_write_config_byte(dev,
>> + fn->dvsec_afu_info_pos + OCXL_DVSEC_AFU_INFO_AFU_IDX,
>> + afu_idx);
>> rc = read_afu_info(dev, fn, OCXL_DVSEC_TEMPL_VERSION, &val);
>> if (rc)
>> return rc;
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-14 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-13 14:09 [PATCH V2] ocxl: Fix access to the AFU Descriptor Data Christophe Lombard
2018-08-13 14:50 ` Frederic Barrat
2018-08-14 1:15 ` Andrew Donnellan
2018-08-14 3:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-08-14 12:22 ` christophe lombard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=954aa561-0eeb-db87-42f7-56c11f967a9d@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).