From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D610DDF65 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:28:49 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080321072419.2372774b@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org> References: <1205943310-26323-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <1206090031.8420.67.camel@pasglop> <200803211154.34027.sr@denx.de> <20080321072419.2372774b@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9638a186ce2754343d4d349e55c15e2a@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Add AMCC Glacier 460GT eval board dts Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:28:38 +0100 To: Josh Boyer Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >>> As for the DTS, maybe a "compatible" property in the CPU might make >>> some >>> sense with a content along the lines of "ppc440x6" or whatever rev of >>> the 440 core it is. >>> >>> What do you think ? >> >> Good idea. I'll try to come up with a list for all existing 4xx SoC's >> and it's >> core versions. > > I don't really care either way, but what does that buy us? Merely > documentation? Obviously, as long as the kernel doesn't use the device tree for probing the CPUs available, additions to the device tree here don't affect the kernel at all ;-P Segher