From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34692DDDF9 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:33:58 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <000801c7460d$211e46e0$6405a8c0@absolut> References: <000601c74531$62220820$6405a8c0@absolut> <0ACC0A3E-9DF3-4927-8F67-E525BA0E6C13@kernel.crashing.org> <000001c7454b$69a25ae0$6405a8c0@absolut> <0A655A39-4101-48B4-BE9C-50A30163679C@kernel.crashing.org> <000701c7457a$d180e300$6405a8c0@absolut> <183E66A5-E983-4D17-96E9-2EEAE6FDF7B6@kernel.crashing.org> <000f01c74587$10bc5cf0$6405a8c0@absolut> <1546691E-0CCF-41C9-8B8A-7C6326CEEF7E@kernel.crashing.org> <000301c7458b$b9eb1330$6405a8c0@absolut> <829261C6-F534-4B85-A04D-8D280E46B2CF@kernel.crashing.org> <000401c74591$8a3a4ec0$6405a8c0@absolut> <000801c7460d$211e46e0$6405a8c0@absolut> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <974C77BD-19A0-4843-8E7B-3B430DB4ADE9@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: 8360E - PCI / DTC Blob Setup Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:33:00 -0600 To: rmcguire@videopresence.com Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Feb 1, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Russell McGuire wrote: > Since I am hip deep in debugging the PCI system. > > In the .dts files there is the section for the PCI setup. > > The interrupt-map = < > > > Does this need to include: > 1) A mapping for every IDSEL line in the system? > 2) Only those IDSELs that are used on the slots on the motherboard? I'm not sure I follow the difference between 1/2. The map needs to cover every IDSEL that has an IRQ line wired to it. > 3) A custom entry for every card we want to support? See above. > 4) How does a bridge chip and slave busses affect the entries, if > at all? Uugh, I'm not sure how bridges are handled at this point. > Looking at the mpc8360 / 8349 setups that are part of the latest > kernel > trees, some are place many and some are placing just a single entry? > > Which should be the preferred method? It depends on your HW setup, the 8360/49 boards have some 'odd' IDSEL irq mapping. - k