From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/32: Remove PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT to fix startup failure
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 16:57:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <977ad5eef4f8726e9d5bff31b758918f0341659d.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b5e6eb281d7b1ea77619bee17095f905a125168.1757003584.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 18:33 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT is an old macro that is used to tell kernel whether
> kernel text has to be mapped read-only or read-write based on build
> time options.
>
> But nowadays, with functionnalities like jump_labels, static links,
> etc ... more only less all kernels need to be read-write at some
> point, and some combinations of configs failed to work due to
> innacurate setting of PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT. On the other hand, today
> we have CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX which implements a more controlled
> access to kernel modifications.
>
> Instead of trying to keep PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT accurate with all
> possible options that may imply kernel text modification, always
> set kernel text read-write at startup and rely on
> CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX to provide accurate protection.
>
> Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/342b4120-911c-4723-82ec-d8c9b03a8aef@mailbox.org/
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
The original issue that Erhard and I were investigating was why the latest
version of the PowerPC page table check series[0] was failing on his G4, when
built as part of a config with many other debugging options enabled.
With further instrumentation, it turns out that this was due to a failed
instruction patch while setting up a jump label for the
page_table_check_disabled static key, which was being checked in
page_table_check_pte_clear(), which was in turn inlined ultimately into
debug_vm_pgtable().
This patch seems to fix the problem, so:
Tested-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
But I'm still curious about why I only see the issue when:
(a) CONFIG_KFENCE=y (even when disabled using kfence.sample_interval=0) -
noting that changing CONFIG_KFENCE doesn't change the definition of
PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT; and
(b) when the jump label ends up in a __init function (removing __init from
debug_vm_pgtable() and its associated functions, or changing the code in such a
way that the static key check doesn't get inlined, resolves the issue, and
similarly for test_static_call_init() when CONFIG_STATIC_CALL_SELFTEST=y).
I don't understand the mm code well enough to make sense of this.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250813062614.51759-1-ajd@linux.ibm.com/
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 22:44 Kernel v6.17-rc4 with STATIC_CALL_SELFTEST=y enabled fails to boot at early stage (PowerMac G4 DP) Erhard Furtner
2025-09-04 7:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-04 8:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-04 8:40 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2025-09-04 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-04 9:03 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2025-09-04 9:57 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-09-04 10:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-04 16:33 ` [PATCH] powerpc/32: Remove PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT to fix startup failure Christophe Leroy
2025-09-05 3:55 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-09-05 5:07 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-05 5:23 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-09-05 6:57 ` Andrew Donnellan [this message]
2025-09-05 9:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-05 14:30 ` Erhard Furtner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=977ad5eef4f8726e9d5bff31b758918f0341659d.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).