From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5CB67A6B for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:51:59 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20050316221402.GA8345@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050316221402.GA8345@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <97927672280934c417f3e8fceb7a144b@freescale.com> From: Kumar Gala Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:52:00 -0600 To: "Tom Rini" Cc: linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: 440EP FPU patch List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I dont have either of these readily available at this point. If you dont mind running it through when you get a chance. However, is=20= this going to test anything but FP? - kumar On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:22:48AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > Jason, > > > > Is it possible to make this against a newer tree (like a current bk > > pull).=A0 The patch doesn't apply cleanly against head.S, which I'm > > guessing is due to the SPRN changes pushed upstream recently. > > > > If I can apply it cleanly, I will get it pushed upstream. > > Can one of you run say LTP on a classic box, just as a sanity test > before pushing?=A0 If not, lemme know and I'll do it :) > > --=20 > Tom Rini > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/