From: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add set_memory_{p/np}() and remove set_memory_attr()
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:36:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <984da14c339ae81b45518002081f791153fe69dd.camel@russell.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <715cc0c2f801ef3b39b91233be44d328a91c30bc.1639123757.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 08:09 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> set_memory_attr() was implemented by commit 4d1755b6a762
> ("powerpc/mm:
> implement set_memory_attr()") because the set_memory_xx() couldn't
> be used at that time to modify memory "on the fly" as explained it
> the commit.
>
> But set_memory_attr() uses set_pte_at() which leads to warnings when
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is selected, because set_pte_at() is unexpected for
> updating existing page table entries.
>
> The check could be bypassed by using __set_pte_at() instead,
> as it was the case before commit c988cfd38e48 ("powerpc/32:
> use set_memory_attr()") but since commit 9f7853d7609d ("powerpc/mm:
> Fix set_memory_*() against concurrent accesses") it is now possible
> to use set_memory_xx() functions to update page table entries
> "on the fly" because the update is now atomic.
>
> For DEBUG_PAGEALLOC we need to clear and set back _PAGE_PRESENT.
> Add set_memory_np() and set_memory_p() for that.
>
> Replace all uses of set_memory_attr() by the relevant set_memory_xx()
> and remove set_memory_attr().
>
> Reported-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
> Fixes: c988cfd38e48 ("powerpc/32: use set_memory_attr()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Depends-on: 9f7853d7609d ("powerpc/mm: Fix set_memory_*() against
> concurrent accesses")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
One comment below:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h
> index b040094f7920..061f1766a8a4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> #define SET_MEMORY_RW 1
> #define SET_MEMORY_NX 2
> #define SET_MEMORY_X 3
> +#define SET_MEMORY_NP 4
> +#define SET_MEMORY_P 5
It might be nice to have a comment somewhere in set_memory.h explaining
that {p/np} = present/not present. RO/RW/NX/X are commonly used, "p"
as shorthand for "present" is less obvious. x86's set_memory.h has a
nice comment covering everything as an example.
> int change_memory_attr(unsigned long addr, int numpages, long
> action);
>
> @@ -29,6 +31,14 @@ static inline int set_memory_x(unsigned long addr,
> int numpages)
> return change_memory_attr(addr, numpages, SET_MEMORY_X);
> }
>
> -int set_memory_attr(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t
> prot);
> +static inline int set_memory_np(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> +{
> + return change_memory_attr(addr, numpages, SET_MEMORY_NP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int set_memory_p(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> +{
> + return change_memory_attr(addr, numpages, SET_MEMORY_P);
> +}
>
> #endif
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 8:09 [PATCH] powerpc: Add set_memory_{p/np}() and remove set_memory_attr() Christophe Leroy
2021-12-10 20:37 ` Maxime Bizon
2021-12-13 4:36 ` Russell Currey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=984da14c339ae81b45518002081f791153fe69dd.camel@russell.cc \
--to=ruscur@russell.cc \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).