linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
	hbathini@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kjain@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc: Add check for power11 pvr for pmu selfests
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 21:44:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98cca4da-22dc-4f8a-8fad-e71b50a7b916@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113075858.45137-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 13/01/25 1:28 pm, Athira Rajeev wrote:

Some of the tests depends on pvr value to choose
the event. Example:
- event_alternatives_tests_p10: alternative event depends
   on registered PMU driver which is based on pvr
- generic_events_valid_test varies based on platform
- bhrb_filter_map_test: again its dependent on pmu to
   decide which bhrb filter to use
- reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode: randome sampling
   mode reserved bits is also varies based on platform

Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I have tested the patches on PowerPC by compiling and running pmu selftest.

For the series:
Tested-by: Disha Goel<disgoel@linux.ibm.com>

---
Changelog:
  v1 -> v2
  No code changes. Rebased to latest upstream

  .../pmu/event_code_tests/event_alternatives_tests_p10.c    | 3 ++-
  .../pmu/event_code_tests/generic_events_valid_test.c       | 3 ++-
  .../reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode_test.c            | 3 ++-
  .../powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/bhrb_filter_map_test.c      | 7 +++++--
  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/event_alternatives_tests_p10.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/event_alternatives_tests_p10.c
index 8be7aada6523..355f8bbe06c3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/event_alternatives_tests_p10.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/event_alternatives_tests_p10.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static int event_alternatives_tests_p10(void)
  {
  	struct event *e, events[5];
  	int i;
+	int pvr = PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR));

  	/* Check for platform support for the test */
  	SKIP_IF(platform_check_for_tests());
@@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ static int event_alternatives_tests_p10(void)
  	 * code and using PVR will work correctly for all cases
  	 * including generic compat mode.
  	 */
-	SKIP_IF(PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) != POWER10);
+	SKIP_IF((pvr != POWER10) && (pvr != POWER11));

  	SKIP_IF(check_for_generic_compat_pmu());

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/generic_events_valid_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/generic_events_valid_test.c
index 0d237c15d3f2..a378fa9a5a7b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/generic_events_valid_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/generic_events_valid_test.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
  static int generic_events_valid_test(void)
  {
  	struct event event;
+	int pvr = mfspr(SPRN_PVR);

  	/* Check for platform support for the test */
  	SKIP_IF(platform_check_for_tests());
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ static int generic_events_valid_test(void)
  	 * - PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND
  	 * - PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES
  	 */
-	if (PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) == POWER10) {
+	if ((pvr == POWER10) || (pvr == POWER11)) {
  		event_init_opts(&event, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, "event");
  		FAIL_IF(event_open(&event));
  		event_close(&event);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode_test.c
index 4c119c821b99..7bb26a232fbe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode_test.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
  static int reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode(void)
  {
  	struct event event;
+	int pvr = PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR));

  	/* Check for platform support for the test */
  	SKIP_IF(platform_check_for_tests());
@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ static int reserved_bits_mmcra_sample_elig_mode(void)
  	 * is reserved in power10 and 0xC is reserved in
  	 * power9.
  	 */
-	if (PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) == POWER10) {
+	if ((pvr == POWER10) || (pvr == POWER11)) {
  		event_init(&event, 0x100401e0);
  		FAIL_IF(!event_open(&event));
  	} else if (PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) == POWER9) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/bhrb_filter_map_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/bhrb_filter_map_test.c
index 3f43c315c666..64ab9784f9b1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/bhrb_filter_map_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/bhrb_filter_map_test.c
@@ -83,13 +83,16 @@ static int bhrb_filter_map_test(void)
  	 * using PVR will work correctly for all cases including generic
  	 * compat mode.
  	 */
-	if (PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) == POWER10) {
+	switch (PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR))) {
+	case POWER11:
+	case POWER10:
  		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bhrb_filter_map_valid_p10); i++) {
  			event.attr.branch_sample_type = bhrb_filter_map_valid_p10[i];
  			FAIL_IF(event_open(&event));
  			event_close(&event);
  		}
-	} else {
+		break;
+	default:
  		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bhrb_filter_map_valid_p10); i++) {
  			event.attr.branch_sample_type = bhrb_filter_map_valid_p10[i];
  			FAIL_IF(!event_open(&event));



  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-13  7:58 [PATCH V2 1/5] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc: Enable pmu selftests for power11 Athira Rajeev
2025-01-13  7:58 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc: Add check for power11 pvr for pmu selfests Athira Rajeev
2025-01-15 16:14   ` Disha Goel [this message]
2025-01-13  7:58 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu: Update comment description to mention ISA v3.1 for power10 and above Athira Rajeev
2025-01-13  7:58 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] selftests/powerpc/pmu: Add interface test for extended reg support Athira Rajeev
2025-01-13  7:58 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] selftests/powerpc/pmu: Update comment with details to understand auxv_generic_compat_pmu() utility function Athira Rajeev
2025-02-17  7:28 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc: Enable pmu selftests for power11 Madhavan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98cca4da-22dc-4f8a-8fad-e71b50a7b916@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).