* PReP spec @ 1999-02-10 19:53 Rick Kwan 1999-02-11 3:17 ` Ken Roberts 1999-02-11 3:55 ` Troy Benjegerdes 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Rick Kwan @ 1999-02-10 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rick.kwan Hello, list... I have never posted here before. These are sorta more hardware questions, but I'm not sure where else to ask. My motivation is that I inherited a PReP box a year ago, and intermittently play with it (e.g., Valentine's Day release); I'm trying to migrate into serious play. How does one get a copy of the PReP specification? Is PReP still considered a viable commercial architecture or is it reaching end-of-life? --Rick Kwan rick.kwan@lightsaber.com [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: PReP spec 1999-02-10 19:53 PReP spec Rick Kwan @ 1999-02-11 3:17 ` Ken Roberts 1999-02-11 4:29 ` David Edelsohn 1999-02-11 3:55 ` Troy Benjegerdes 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Ken Roberts @ 1999-02-11 3:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rick Kwan; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, rick.kwan this link will give you a list of places to find the prep spec. http://www.mot.com/SPS/PowerPC/library/ppc_faq/ppc_faq.html#3-7 prep has been replaced by chrp, which can also be found in the faq i point you to. prep is, i think, 1995 technology. that makes it not exactly new, but not that old either. newer than many technologies that are still in high production. for more info on those, go see http://www.intel.com and http://www.microsoft.com. (couldn't resist the wintel slur, sorry.) i think prep was a starter-step towards chrp, but there are quite a number of prep boxes out there. everything ibm made that's powerpc, i think, was prep or chrp. all the current rs/6000's, as/400's, and system 390's are powerpc and chrp. the older powerpc machines of these lines are, as far as i know, prep. some of these platforms comply with a tighter standard within chrp, if i understand things correctly. >Hello, list... I have never posted here before. These are sorta >more hardware questions, but I'm not sure where else to ask. >My motivation is that I inherited a PReP box a year ago, and >intermittently play with it (e.g., Valentine's Day release); I'm >trying to migrate into serious play. > >How does one get a copy of the PReP specification? > >Is PReP still considered a viable commercial architecture or is it >reaching end-of-life? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ken Roberts ken.r@worldnet.att.net Oft-times thou feelest like unto a nut, And yet, M'lord, anon, feel'st thou not so. Yon Almond Joy these selfsame nuts doth have, Whereas contrary Mounds doth have them not. -- William Shakespeare, kind of [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: PReP spec 1999-02-11 3:17 ` Ken Roberts @ 1999-02-11 4:29 ` David Edelsohn 1999-02-12 2:31 ` Ken Roberts 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Edelsohn @ 1999-02-11 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ken Roberts; +Cc: Rick Kwan, linuxppc-dev, rick.kwan >>>>> Ken Roberts writes: Ken> everything ibm made that's powerpc, i think, was prep or Ken> chrp. all the current rs/6000's, as/400's, and system 390's are powerpc and Ken> chrp. the older powerpc machines of these lines are, as far as i know, prep. S/390 is neither PowerPC nor CHRP. Recent AS/400 systems are PowerPC based. I am not sure if any AS/400 systems are CHRP and not all RS/6000 systems are CHRP. David [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: PReP spec 1999-02-11 4:29 ` David Edelsohn @ 1999-02-12 2:31 ` Ken Roberts 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ken Roberts @ 1999-02-12 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: Rick Kwan, linuxppc-dev, rick.kwan >Ken> everything ibm made that's powerpc, i think, was prep or >Ken> chrp. all the current rs/6000's, as/400's, and system 390's are powerpc and >Ken> chrp. the older powerpc machines of these lines are, as far as i know, prep. > S/390 is neither PowerPC nor CHRP. Recent AS/400 systems are >PowerPC based. I am not sure if any AS/400 systems are CHRP and not all >RS/6000 systems are CHRP. ok, i was mistaken about the 390. i work at ibm rochester, and was told there that everything ibm makes is ppc, excepting their intel systems. since the 390 isn't ppc, it also can't be chrp. however, everything as/400 that is in current production is powerpc, and i know positively that the lower-end models are chrp. the last i looked at the rs6k site was when the s70 was released, which was the first power64 chip in production. as of that point, everything _new_ in the rs6000 line was a power chip of some sort or another. the older models are cisc. i recall that the s70 was chrp, and some of the other new ones are chrp. there's also a lot of prep in there. looking through the web pages right now, there's not a single mention of chrp for ANY rs6000. i know that there are at least some. regardless, i'm not trying to start a war here. i'm interested in finding the truth, and appreciate your making me investigate further. i was told that the 390's were ppc, but this can't be the case since the 390's have their own special os-on-a-chip thing that is the hallmark of the 390. i knew this, yet somehow bought the idea that it was also powerpc, which just can't be. i'll check out more on the as/400 and rs/6000 at work, and see if i can scare up a list of chrp machines. this may prove interesting for the linux project, although i strongly suspect that device drivers on the 400 will be difficult to come by. there's an awful lot of 400-specific stuff out there. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ken Roberts ken.r@worldnet.att.net Oft-times thou feelest like unto a nut, And yet, M'lord, anon, feel'st thou not so. Yon Almond Joy these selfsame nuts doth have, Whereas contrary Mounds doth have them not. -- William Shakespeare, kind of [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: PReP spec 1999-02-10 19:53 PReP spec Rick Kwan 1999-02-11 3:17 ` Ken Roberts @ 1999-02-11 3:55 ` Troy Benjegerdes 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Troy Benjegerdes @ 1999-02-11 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rick Kwan; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, rick.kwan On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Rick Kwan wrote: > > Hello, list... I have never posted here before. These are sorta > more hardware questions, but I'm not sure where else to ask. > My motivation is that I inherited a PReP box a year ago, and > intermittently play with it (e.g., Valentine's Day release); I'm > trying to migrate into serious play. > > How does one get a copy of the PReP specification? > > Is PReP still considered a viable commercial architecture or is it > reaching end-of-life? Look on Motorola's MCG website.. (www.mcg.mot.com, I think) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Troy Benjegerdes | troy@microux.com | hozer@drgw.net | | Unix is user friendly... You just have to be friendly to it first. | | This message composed with 100% free software. http://www.gnu.org | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-02-12 2:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 1999-02-10 19:53 PReP spec Rick Kwan 1999-02-11 3:17 ` Ken Roberts 1999-02-11 4:29 ` David Edelsohn 1999-02-12 2:31 ` Ken Roberts 1999-02-11 3:55 ` Troy Benjegerdes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).