From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from over.co.us.ibm.com (over.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "over.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDF867D50 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:50:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.249.41]) by bldfb.esmtp.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3D2FgcX002718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:15:42 -0400 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3D2FcR2029799 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:15:38 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k3D2C8YY257868 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:12:08 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k3D2FZa9019563 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:15:35 -0600 In-Reply-To: <5148225C-AE27-4365-A1C2-40C46491AF0D@watson.ibm.com> References: <5148225C-AE27-4365-A1C2-40C46491AF0D@watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9B2C87C5-0B69-46E7-B48B-9CDB882836B2@watson.ibm.com> From: Jimi Xenidis Subject: Re: [patch][rfc]flattened device tree: Passing a dtb (blob) to Linux. Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:15:40 -0400 To: Jimi Xenidis Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Apr 12, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > > NOTE: that the dtc must also not generate the blob reservation > entry. This reservation is only generated for "asm" dtc targets so it is only that case that need to be changed. > Should we try to detect this redundant entry? Should we bump > the DT version number? -JX