From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7963DDF45 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 03:31:01 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20070131081519.6af307ce@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070130230711.21111.52924.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070130230859.21111.39370.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070131073947.67520c16@localhost.localdomain> <20C6E81C-CB34-461A-B1CD-FF302D83E2AB@kernel.crashing.org> <20070131081519.6af307ce@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9DA72E8D-CB20-4EE5-8AE0-61BCB97F6C9E@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [POWERPC] Fix kernel build errors for mpc8272ads and mpc8560ads Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:29:57 -0600 To: Vitaly Bordug Cc: linuxppc-dev , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> I think the 8272 dts still had the node in it. >> > No it does not, in the latest resubmit series at least - just have > checked. Yeah I noticed, I meant from the patchset earlier in the day :) - k