From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45165DE00E for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 03:13:44 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20070322155155.GA19903@lixom.net> References: <1174573524.6595.509.camel@ld0161-tx32> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302B97F7C@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> <20070322155155.GA19903@lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9b696f240ad2e61f74162bba8fc51947@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH Resend 01/02] Add Linux ASMP support for MPC8641D] Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:13:10 +0100 To: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Yoder Stuart-B08248 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > This is quite a special case. Having a brand new property for it might > be a good idea. It's a pretty big hack anyway, so adding another one to > the device tree isn't that big a deal. Yes please. If you must put this information in a property in the mpic node (I'm not convinced you should, but I haven't really looked at it either), please don't overload the existing "interrupts" semantics -- just use a different property name (and choose some descriptive new name, not something too generic). Segher