From: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] mm/hotplug: Support memmap_on_memory when memmap is not aligned to pageblocks
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:27:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d1448d3-a43a-5305-68aa-d82111fe077a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeab0767-457a-a2d1-8b23-4dde5acf48f4@redhat.com>
On 7/26/23 2:34 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>>>> /*
>>>> @@ -1310,7 +1400,10 @@ int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
>>>> {
>>>> struct mhp_params params = { .pgprot = pgprot_mhp(PAGE_KERNEL) };
>>>> enum memblock_flags memblock_flags = MEMBLOCK_NONE;
>>>> - struct vmem_altmap mhp_altmap = {};
>>>> + struct vmem_altmap mhp_altmap = {
>>>> + .base_pfn = PHYS_PFN(res->start),
>>>> + .end_pfn = PHYS_PFN(res->end),
>>>
>>> Is it required to set .end_pfn, and if so, shouldn't we also set it to
>>> base_pfn + memory_block_memmap_on_memory_pages()) ?
>>>
>>
>> We use that in ppc64 for checking altmap boundary condition. As we
>> discussed earlier, ppc64 due to vmemmap mapping size restrictions can't
>> always allocate vmemmap pages from altmap area even if requested. We
>> fallback to regular memory alocation in that case (only used now with
>> pmem). We use altmap.end_pfn for that boundary check. You can refer to
>> altmap_cross_boundary() for more details.
>
> But even then, setting the end to the end of the resource size is wrong, no? We don't want anybody to allocate beyond base_pfn + memory_block_memmap_on_memory_pages().
>
altmap.end is the end pfn of the resource
__nvdimm_setup_pfn()
...
resource_size_t end = nsio->res.end - end_trunc;
struct vmem_altmap __altmap = {
.base_pfn = init_altmap_base(base),
.reserve = init_altmap_reserve(base),
.end_pfn = PHYS_PFN(end),
};
And we use it to find that the page_to_pfn mapping we use by allocating a page from altmap doesn't point to a pfn that is outside the resource range.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-26 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 10:02 [PATCH v5 0/7] Add support for memmap on memory feature on ppc64 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] mm/hotplug: Simplify ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE kconfig Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] mm/hotplug: Allow memmap on memory hotplug request to fallback Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] mm/hotplug: Allow architecture to override memmap on memory support check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] mm/hotplug: Support memmap_on_memory when memmap is not aligned to pageblocks Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 18:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-26 4:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-26 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-26 9:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K V [this message]
2023-07-26 16:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] powerpc/book3s64/memhotplug: Enable memmap on memory for radix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] mm/hotplug: Embed vmem_altmap details in memory block Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-26 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-26 10:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-26 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] mm/hotplug: Enable runtime update of memmap_on_memory parameter Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 17:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Add support for memmap on memory feature on ppc64 David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d1448d3-a43a-5305-68aa-d82111fe077a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).