linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC: MPIC ack interrupts at mpic_teardown_this_cpu()
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:38:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d19fecb0ef172995b7ce3a317ee3c0d@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080404052955.GC11799@lixom.net>

>>> We really need to ack interrupts at mpic_teardown, since
>>> not all platforms reset mpic at kernel start-up. For example,
>>> kexec'ed kernel hangs on P.A. Semi if mpic_eoi() isn't called.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@ru.mvista.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Would be interesting to find out why it hangs tho... it shouldn't .
>
> I haven't reproduced the problem and looked at hardware state yet, but 
> I
> would expect it to be because the openpic won't send another interrupt
> until the previous is EOI'd, and the IPI is never EOI'd as far as I
> can tell.
>
> The XICS code does it explicitly already. I'm surprised it doesn't 
> break
> on the 970-based platforms actually...

platforms/maple/setup.c and platforms/powermac/pic.c use 
MPIC_WANTS_RESET.
Is there a reason why we don't do that on every MPIC?  If there is such
a reason, the default should be to reset, only pseries and chrp and cell
and now pasemi do not use it.  It's the only sane way to get an MPIC 
into
a sane known state starting from <whatever> state.


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-04 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-03 19:09 [PATCH] PowerPC: MPIC ack interrupts at mpic_teardown_this_cpu() Valentine Barshak
2008-04-03 21:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-04  5:29   ` Olof Johansson
2008-04-04 17:38     ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2008-04-04 18:03       ` Olof Johansson
2008-04-04 18:55         ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-04-04 19:39           ` Olof Johansson
2008-04-07 14:24 ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9d19fecb0ef172995b7ce3a317ee3c0d@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).