From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PPC32] ADMA support for PPC 440SPe processors.
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:38:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9db80aa3f81b1c7fa6e7bb761b7642a3@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0703221419280.7246@pademelon.sonytel.be>
>> That sounds nice. There are slightly fewer things called
>> SPU than there are called SPE I imagine? Or is it just a
>> historical misnomer.
>
> AFAIK SPE is the preferred name, as the SPU is only a part of the SPE.
> That's what I was told.
And you were told right. I was trying to be sarcastic
here, but you missed it. Don't worry, it wasn't aimed
at you anyway ;-)
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-15 23:29 [PATCH] [PPC32] ADMA support for PPC 440SPe processors Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 5:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-03-16 5:55 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 10:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 16:33 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 8:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-16 10:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 12:44 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-16 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 18:00 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-17 8:09 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-17 18:17 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-17 18:43 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-17 19:09 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-19 16:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-20 3:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-20 5:39 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-21 14:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-21 19:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-21 20:03 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-22 11:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-22 12:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-22 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-22 13:38 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-03-17 8:57 ` Yuri Tikhonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9db80aa3f81b1c7fa6e7bb761b7642a3@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).