From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix conversion to gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 18:02:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e0a256b-fb5a-4468-ed21-68d524d6ea56@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505121509.1470207-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
On 05/05/21 14:15, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Commit b1c5356e873c ("KVM: PPC: Convert to the gfn-based MMU notifier
> callbacks") causes unmap_gfn_range and age_gfn callbacks to only work
> on the first gfn in the range. It also makes the aging callbacks call
> into both radix and hash aging functions for radix guests. Fix this.
>
> Add warnings for the single-gfn calls that have been converted to range
> callbacks, in case they ever receieve ranges greater than 1.
>
> Fixes: b1c5356e873c ("KVM: PPC: Convert to the gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks")
> Reported-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Sorry for the breakage. I queued this patch.
Paolo
> ---
> The e500 change in that commit also looks suspicious, why is it okay
> to remove kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() there? Also is the the change from
> returning false to true intended?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c | 5 ++-
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> index a6e9a5585e61..e6b53c6e21e3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ extern void kvmppc_free_pgtable_radix(struct kvm *kvm, pgd_t *pgd,
> unsigned int lpid);
> extern int kvmppc_radix_init(void);
> extern void kvmppc_radix_exit(void);
> -extern bool kvm_unmap_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> +extern void kvm_unmap_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> unsigned long gfn);
> extern bool kvm_age_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> unsigned long gfn);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> index b7bd9ca040b8..2d9193cd73be 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static void kvmppc_unmap_hpte(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long i,
> }
> }
>
> -static bool kvm_unmap_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> +static void kvm_unmap_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> unsigned long gfn)
> {
> unsigned long i;
> @@ -829,15 +829,21 @@ static bool kvm_unmap_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> unlock_rmap(rmapp);
> __unlock_hpte(hptep, be64_to_cpu(hptep[0]));
> }
> - return false;
> }
>
> bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> - if (kvm_is_radix(kvm))
> - return kvm_unmap_radix(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + gfn_t gfn;
> +
> + if (kvm_is_radix(kvm)) {
> + for (gfn = range->start; gfn < range->end; gfn++)
> + kvm_unmap_radix(kvm, range->slot, gfn);
> + } else {
> + for (gfn = range->start; gfn < range->end; gfn++)
> + kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + }
>
> - return kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + return false;
> }
>
> void kvmppc_core_flush_memslot_hv(struct kvm *kvm,
> @@ -924,10 +930,18 @@ static bool kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>
> bool kvm_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> - if (kvm_is_radix(kvm))
> - kvm_age_radix(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + gfn_t gfn;
> + bool ret = false;
>
> - return kvm_age_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + if (kvm_is_radix(kvm)) {
> + for (gfn = range->start; gfn < range->end; gfn++)
> + ret |= kvm_age_radix(kvm, range->slot, gfn);
> + } else {
> + for (gfn = range->start; gfn < range->end; gfn++)
> + ret |= kvm_age_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, gfn);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static bool kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> @@ -965,18 +979,24 @@ static bool kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>
> bool kvm_test_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> - if (kvm_is_radix(kvm))
> - kvm_test_age_radix(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + WARN_ON(range->start + 1 != range->end);
>
> - return kvm_test_age_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + if (kvm_is_radix(kvm))
> + return kvm_test_age_radix(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + else
> + return kvm_test_age_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> }
>
> bool kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> + WARN_ON(range->start + 1 != range->end);
> +
> if (kvm_is_radix(kvm))
> - return kvm_unmap_radix(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + kvm_unmap_radix(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + else
> + kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
>
> - return kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, range->slot, range->start);
> + return false;
> }
>
> static int vcpus_running(struct kvm *kvm)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c
> index ec4f58fa9f5a..d909c069363e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c
> @@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ int kvmppc_book3s_radix_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
>
> /* Called with kvm->mmu_lock held */
> -bool kvm_unmap_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> +void kvm_unmap_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> unsigned long gfn)
> {
> pte_t *ptep;
> @@ -1002,14 +1002,13 @@ bool kvm_unmap_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>
> if (kvm->arch.secure_guest & KVMPPC_SECURE_INIT_DONE) {
> uv_page_inval(kvm->arch.lpid, gpa, PAGE_SHIFT);
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> ptep = find_kvm_secondary_pte(kvm, gpa, &shift);
> if (ptep && pte_present(*ptep))
> kvmppc_unmap_pte(kvm, ptep, gpa, shift, memslot,
> kvm->arch.lpid);
> - return false;
> }
>
> /* Called with kvm->mmu_lock held */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-05 12:15 [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix conversion to gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks Nicholas Piggin
2021-05-05 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-06 4:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-05-05 16:02 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-05-06 13:43 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e0a256b-fb5a-4468-ed21-68d524d6ea56@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).