From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3BADDEDA for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:21:20 +1100 (EST) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so3344372wag for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:21:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9e4733910711071421i347a6a0bu99cbf062cc152aca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:21:19 -0500 From: "Jon Smirl" To: "Matt Sealey" Subject: Re: use of fsl, in lite5200b.dts in git current In-Reply-To: <4732396D.4040904@genesi-usa.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <9e4733910711071355l75da5444kb7082692f1bdc0@mail.gmail.com> <4732396D.4040904@genesi-usa.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I'm not in favor of all these fsl prefixes. These chip families do get sold. What would we have done with intel,pxa320 all over the place when they sold it to marvell? mass changes to marvell,pxa320? The mpc/pxa parts numbers don't get changes when chip families get sold. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com