From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: "Segher Boessenkool" <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: PowerPC dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Revisited, audio codec device tree entries.
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:49:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4733910711181349q1f840bc2w8d30bb33d2a353ce@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0fd3304ee694b2dc6a8f3055c08dc015@kernel.crashing.org>
On 11/18/07, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > David Gibson
> > made a proposal that a fabric node wrap the codec node. That doesn't
> > work very well with the i2c bus where the bus code is walking down the
> > nodes and triggering the instantiation of the i2c drivers.
>
> Yeah, doesn't work at all.
>
> > But what about putting the fabric node inside the codec node?
>
> _Which_ codec node? Having more than one isn't uncommon at all.
In all of them. Fabric can probably be split into pieces that
corresponds to the codec.
> There is no way you can describe this fabric stuff in a generic way in
> the device tree. Just hardcode it in your platform support code; if
> the platform code supports several variant boards, _it_ can probe that
> from the device tree (in whatever way works for that platform).
The codec-fabric node was just being used to trigger the loading of
the platform specific driver.
>
>
> Segher
>
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-18 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-18 18:10 Revisited, audio codec device tree entries Jon Smirl
2007-11-18 20:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-11-18 21:49 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2007-11-18 22:46 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-18 23:31 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-18 23:47 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 0:12 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 0:22 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 12:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-11-20 0:22 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 16:31 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-19 17:05 ` Scott Wood
2007-11-19 18:55 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-20 0:33 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 12:07 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-11-19 16:58 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-20 1:42 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 14:57 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 15:33 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 15:02 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 15:15 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-11-19 15:33 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-19 16:00 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 16:31 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-19 16:51 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 17:33 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-19 19:20 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 19:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-20 0:59 ` David Gibson
2007-11-26 15:51 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-26 16:38 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-26 16:40 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 16:45 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 22:37 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 16:44 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 16:53 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-19 16:55 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 15:37 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 15:42 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e4733910711181349q1f840bc2w8d30bb33d2a353ce@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).