linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: PowerPC dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: ppc vs powerpc
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:04:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4733910712101304s23aa02b0o1be2ed9856ea1f8d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40712101259h22be4b89ke4f36564a7c1866c@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/10/07, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On 12/10/07, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the plan for ppc to be completely merged with powerpc and then be
> > eliminated? If so, how close is this to completion?
> >
> > What should we do with ppc users of mpc-i2c? If the plan is to
> > eliminate ppc I would say to just copy the existing driver and then
> > delete the old version when the rest of ppc gets deleted.
>
> arch/ppc is scheduled to be removed middle of 2008.  Don't break
> arch/ppc users before then.  Ideally there should be overlap between
> the addition of support in arch/powerpc and the removal of support
> from arch/ppc.
>
> Personally, I structure the driver to support both platform bus and
> of_platform bus.  It's not hard to do and it keeps things
> understandable.  Take a look at drivers/block/xsysace for an example.

I can look at it but I'm not enthused about writing new code to
support something that is scheduled to be deleted in six months. It
would be much simpler to just copy the old driver. I'm spending way
too much time on what I thought was a fairly simple change.

>
> Cheers,
> g.
>
>
> --
> Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
> Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
> grant.likely@secretlab.ca
> (403) 399-0195
>


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-10 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-10 20:54 ppc vs powerpc Jon Smirl
2007-12-10 20:59 ` Grant Likely
2007-12-10 21:04   ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2007-12-10 21:54   ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-10 22:01     ` Tony Breeds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-11 12:33 PPC vs POWERPC samppa
2008-01-11 14:52 ` Grant Likely
2008-01-15 10:38   ` Matias Sundman
2008-01-15 17:01     ` Jon Loeliger
2008-01-15 17:07       ` Scott Wood
2008-01-15 17:14         ` Jon Loeliger
2008-01-15 17:47       ` Matias Sundman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e4733910712101304s23aa02b0o1be2ed9856ea1f8d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).