linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: "Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
	i2c@lm-sensors.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-pcf8563: Add device ids table
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:11:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4733910804230611s5ce220pda75119138e60eb2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080423131657.71d6312f@hyperion.delvare>

On 4/23/08, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
>
>  On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:11:56 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>  > Hi Jean,
>  >
>  > On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>  > > Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to look at it myself, but I am
>  > > > under the impression that the powerpc folks are tired of having to wait
>  > > > for me and may push it to Linus through their tree? That would be fine
>  > > > with me, as I don't want to be the one delaying something many
>  > > > developers want (but I also can't sign patches I've not even read.)

My company has stuck with 2.6.24 and my original patch set.  We'd like
to sync back up with mainline at some point.

> I still don't know exactly what happened there... I think I saw some
>  "OpenFirmware i2c" patches go upstream yesterday? But not the ones
>  listed below, which I thought they depended upon.
>
>
>  > > The required patches are:
>  > >
>  > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17833
>  > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17834
>  > >
>  > > which are just the forward ported patches you sent to the poweprc mailing
>  > > list some time ago:
>  > >
>  > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=16282
>  > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=16283
>  >
>  > Given that the required patches are just forward-ported versions of patches
>  > you sent (and thus probably reviewed as well :-)), what's the best way to get
>  > them in 2.6.26 (if at all possible) ?
>
>
> It's not that easy. A lot of new new-style i2c drivers have shown up in
>  the kernel since I wrote my patches (themselves derived heavily from
>  Jon Smirl's). Even if Jochen's patches are based on mine, we still need
>  to take a careful look on how each driver is modified, I remember for
>  example that some v4l drivers were using the original new-style driver
>  binding in a way I did not expect. So I can't just sign these patches
>  and hope they didn't break anything. It needs care, and this requires
>  time.
>
>  I will do my best to get this done before the 2.6.26 merge window
>  closes, but I can't promise anything.
>
>  --
>
> Jean Delvare
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>  Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
>  https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-23 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200804171708.32847.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
     [not found] ` <20080418235451.2643183b@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
     [not found]   ` <20080419113417.19f5567a@hyperion.delvare>
     [not found]     ` <4809EF23.7070902@scram.de>
     [not found]       ` <20080419162358.746b714c@hyperion.delvare>
2008-04-19 16:43         ` [PATCH] rtc-pcf8563: Add device ids table Jochen Friedrich
2008-04-21 11:56           ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-21 12:12             ` Stefan Roese
2008-04-23 11:09               ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 11:35                 ` Stefan Roese
2008-04-23 11:45                   ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-04-22 14:11           ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-23 11:16             ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 12:12               ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-23 12:47                 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 13:26                   ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-04-23 13:46                     ` Jon Smirl
2008-04-27 12:18                     ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 13:53                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-23 13:11               ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2008-04-17 15:02 Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-17 15:05 ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e4733910804230611s5ce220pda75119138e60eb2@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).