From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FADDE543 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:11:51 +1000 (EST) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so4307158wag.13 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e4733910804230611s5ce220pda75119138e60eb2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:11:49 -0400 From: "Jon Smirl" To: "Jean Delvare" Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-pcf8563: Add device ids table In-Reply-To: <20080423131657.71d6312f@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <200804171708.32847.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20080419162358.746b714c@hyperion.delvare> <480A2117.7020502@scram.de> <200804221612.06745.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20080423131657.71d6312f@hyperion.delvare> Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Alessandro Zummo , i2c@lm-sensors.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 4/23/08, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:11:56 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > > > On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > > Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to look at it myself, but I am > > > > under the impression that the powerpc folks are tired of having to wait > > > > for me and may push it to Linus through their tree? That would be fine > > > > with me, as I don't want to be the one delaying something many > > > > developers want (but I also can't sign patches I've not even read.) My company has stuck with 2.6.24 and my original patch set. We'd like to sync back up with mainline at some point. > I still don't know exactly what happened there... I think I saw some > "OpenFirmware i2c" patches go upstream yesterday? But not the ones > listed below, which I thought they depended upon. > > > > > The required patches are: > > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17833 > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17834 > > > > > > which are just the forward ported patches you sent to the poweprc mailing > > > list some time ago: > > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=16282 > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=16283 > > > > Given that the required patches are just forward-ported versions of patches > > you sent (and thus probably reviewed as well :-)), what's the best way to get > > them in 2.6.26 (if at all possible) ? > > > It's not that easy. A lot of new new-style i2c drivers have shown up in > the kernel since I wrote my patches (themselves derived heavily from > Jon Smirl's). Even if Jochen's patches are based on mine, we still need > to take a careful look on how each driver is modified, I remember for > example that some v4l drivers were using the original new-style driver > binding in a way I did not expect. So I can't just sign these patches > and hope they didn't break anything. It needs care, and this requires > time. > > I will do my best to get this done before the 2.6.26 merge window > closes, but I can't promise anything. > > -- > > Jean Delvare > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com