From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72856C3065A for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=tuSKZcGD; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WCVDb5H48z3cTw for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:23:27 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=tuSKZcGD; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:40e1:4800::1; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=jarkko@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WCVCr3LZ9z3bhD for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:22:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47367CE17D1; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21A10C116B1; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:22:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719847366; bh=stsqNjcBtVTaNvoSI47EdoM4mGvxzLnZJvbW9mPkCtI=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tuSKZcGD5JfgmUY/kbcDLt95zePIcfcCnlBKKRTLe7XtcyRXvFRlHYJGk4a7IAeXh XSUlmOFMVjHf/Qgj9aCCuBO5RVyTLsuTxxB/Q1s7mlOGlZmnrXcbYvza6/YEmAZEvc FlUEYTyOKWklRCGbf/GGXupL2TgmmwrV85x82iLokynwoQChODdTN/hfB18iJMi5+b ir9tsoFZZVtME3DeGFHXsvljfzFWBlLkeKcW34s4VpGA1rmdoO/yEIHcHr8ZAwLkUV DHTF5yRzeDe87GQ9SgvsOtQsCWBJZpkYp2Qrono1ohQ27yTZQvyTYozkssN+scvbwL oIh9PyTcKgNIg== Message-ID: <9f86a167074d9b522311715c567f1c19b88e3ad4.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: Call tpm2_sessions_init() to initialize session support From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Linux regressions mailing list Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 15:22:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <55e8331d-4682-40df-9a1b-8a08dc5f6409@leemhuis.info> References: <20240617193408.1234365-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> <9e167f3e-cd81-45ab-bd34-939f516b05a4@linux.ibm.com> <55e8331d-4682-40df-9a1b-8a08dc5f6409@leemhuis.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.2 (3.52.2-1.fc40) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Berger Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, 2024-06-28 at 17:00 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leem= huis) wrote: > [CCing the regression list] >=20 > On 20.06.24 00:34, Stefan Berger wrote: > > Jarkko, > > =C2=A0 are you ok with this patch? >=20 > Hmmm, hope I did not miss anythng, but looks like nothing happened for > about 10 days here. Hence: >=20 > Jarkko, looks like some feedback from your side really would help to > find a path to get this regression resolved before 6.10 is released. >=20 > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) Sorry for latency, and except a bit more slow phase also during July because I'm most of this month on Holiday, except taking care 6.11 release. This really is a bug in the HMAC code not in the IBM driver as=20 it should not break because of a new feature, i.e. this is only correct conclusions, give the "no regressions" rule. Since HMAC is by default only for x86_64 and it does not break defconfig's, we should take time and fix the actual issue. BR, Jarkko