From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20070612044246.GC4198@localhost.localdomain> References: <7878cf1aec340b976b90b86b9e83bf18@kernel.crashing.org> <20070612044246.GC4198@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9fbd7a7f5cdde58768569ab23c7aec7c@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Create "rom" (MTD) device prpmc2800 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:50:25 +0200 To: David Gibson Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > So, what you're suggesting is a subnode for each described partition? I'm saying this is a reasonable way to describe the regions of flash the firmware itself cares about. This isn't anything new; it is done like this on some Apple systems, for example. > Seems an awfully verbose way of going about it, Not verbose, but flexible, and in line with everything else about the device tree. > and I don't see what > it buys us over the partitions/partition-names pair of properties. It is extensible. It makes parsing trivial. It represents a flash partition in a way similar to how a "whole" flash device is represented. Segher