From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 6/6] powerpc/cpm2: Remove cpm2_map() and cpm2_unmap()
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 08:04:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fe6ff7284e9f968b12abe7de7c08d7ea40e29d6.1691474658.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b056c4e986a4a7707fc1994304c34f7bd15d6871.1691474658.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Since commit 449012daa92a ("[POWERPC] cpm2: Infrastructure code
cleanup.") cpm2_map() is just returning cpm2_immr pointer and
cpm2_unmap() does nothing.
We already have parts of code that use cpm2_immr directly so get rid
of cpm2_map() and cpm2_unmap() by using cpm2_immr directly. And avoid
going through local pointers that hide the pointed structure.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/fs_pd.h | 8 --------
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fs_pd.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fs_pd.h
index 82f0e528e21c..d530f68b4eef 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fs_pd.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fs_pd.h
@@ -14,14 +14,6 @@
#include <sysdev/fsl_soc.h>
#include <asm/time.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPM2
-#include <asm/cpm2.h>
-
-#define cpm2_map(member) (&cpm2_immr->member)
-#define cpm2_map_size(member, size) (&cpm2_immr->member)
-#define cpm2_unmap(addr) do {} while(0)
-#endif
-
static inline int uart_baudrate(void)
{
return get_baudrate();
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2.c
index a92691193314..14cc5ea936c0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2.c
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/cpm2.h>
#include <asm/rheap.h>
-#include <asm/fs_pd.h>
#include <sysdev/fsl_soc.h>
@@ -118,9 +117,9 @@ void __cpm2_setbrg(uint brg, uint rate, uint clk, int div16, int src)
/* This is good enough to get SMCs running.....
*/
if (brg < 4) {
- bp = cpm2_map_size(im_brgc1, 16);
+ bp = &cpm2_immr->im_brgc1;
} else {
- bp = cpm2_map_size(im_brgc5, 16);
+ bp = &cpm2_immr->im_brgc5;
brg -= 4;
}
bp += brg;
@@ -130,7 +129,6 @@ void __cpm2_setbrg(uint brg, uint rate, uint clk, int div16, int src)
val |= CPM_BRG_DIV16;
out_be32(bp, val);
- cpm2_unmap(bp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpm2_setbrg);
@@ -139,7 +137,6 @@ int __init cpm2_clk_setup(enum cpm_clk_target target, int clock, int mode)
int ret = 0;
int shift;
int i, bits = 0;
- cpmux_t __iomem *im_cpmux;
u32 __iomem *reg;
u32 mask = 7;
@@ -202,35 +199,33 @@ int __init cpm2_clk_setup(enum cpm_clk_target target, int clock, int mode)
{CPM_CLK_SCC4, CPM_CLK8, 7},
};
- im_cpmux = cpm2_map(im_cpmux);
-
switch (target) {
case CPM_CLK_SCC1:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_scr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_scr;
shift = 24;
break;
case CPM_CLK_SCC2:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_scr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_scr;
shift = 16;
break;
case CPM_CLK_SCC3:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_scr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_scr;
shift = 8;
break;
case CPM_CLK_SCC4:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_scr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_scr;
shift = 0;
break;
case CPM_CLK_FCC1:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_fcr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_fcr;
shift = 24;
break;
case CPM_CLK_FCC2:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_fcr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_fcr;
shift = 16;
break;
case CPM_CLK_FCC3:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_fcr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_fcr;
shift = 8;
break;
default:
@@ -260,7 +255,6 @@ int __init cpm2_clk_setup(enum cpm_clk_target target, int clock, int mode)
out_be32(reg, (in_be32(reg) & ~mask) | bits);
- cpm2_unmap(im_cpmux);
return ret;
}
@@ -269,7 +263,6 @@ int __init cpm2_smc_clk_setup(enum cpm_clk_target target, int clock)
int ret = 0;
int shift;
int i, bits = 0;
- cpmux_t __iomem *im_cpmux;
u8 __iomem *reg;
u8 mask = 3;
@@ -284,16 +277,14 @@ int __init cpm2_smc_clk_setup(enum cpm_clk_target target, int clock)
{CPM_CLK_SMC2, CPM_CLK15, 3},
};
- im_cpmux = cpm2_map(im_cpmux);
-
switch (target) {
case CPM_CLK_SMC1:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_smr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_smr;
mask = 3;
shift = 4;
break;
case CPM_CLK_SMC2:
- reg = &im_cpmux->cmx_smr;
+ reg = &cpm2_immr->im_cpmux.cmx_smr;
mask = 3;
shift = 0;
break;
@@ -316,7 +307,6 @@ int __init cpm2_smc_clk_setup(enum cpm_clk_target target, int clock)
out_8(reg, (in_8(reg) & ~mask) | bits);
- cpm2_unmap(im_cpmux);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c
index d6c1359ae89d..e14493685fe8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
#include <asm/immap_cpm2.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
-#include <asm/fs_pd.h>
#include "cpm2_pic.h"
@@ -230,7 +229,7 @@ void cpm2_pic_init(struct device_node *node)
{
int i;
- cpm2_intctl = cpm2_map(im_intctl);
+ cpm2_intctl = &cpm2_immr->im_intctl;
/* Clear the CPM IRQ controller, in case it has any bits set
* from the bootloader
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-08 6:04 [PATCH v1 1/6] powerpc/include: Remove unneeded #include <asm/fs_pd.h> Christophe Leroy
2023-08-08 6:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] powerpc/include: Declare mpc8xx_immr in 8xx_immap.h Christophe Leroy
2023-08-08 6:04 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] powerpc/include: Remove mpc8260.h and m82xx_pci.h Christophe Leroy
2023-08-08 6:04 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] powerpc: Remove CONFIG_PCI_8260 Christophe Leroy
2023-08-08 6:04 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] powerpc/8xx: Remove immr_map() and immr_unmap() Christophe Leroy
2023-08-08 6:04 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2023-08-23 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] powerpc/include: Remove unneeded #include <asm/fs_pd.h> Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fe6ff7284e9f968b12abe7de7c08d7ea40e29d6.1691474658.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).