From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59137C433EF for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6974461139 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:39:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6974461139 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H9QqM4MR3z2yJL for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 04:39:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=192.55.52.93; helo=mga11.intel.com; envelope-from=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H9Qpt0yDnz2y8R for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 04:39:16 +1000 (AEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10109"; a="219447758" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,299,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="219447758" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2021 11:38:09 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,299,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="516866664" Received: from yunyizha-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO skuppusw-mobl5.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.212.124.4]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2021 11:38:07 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function To: Borislav Petkov References: From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" Message-ID: <9fee1cec-fc91-f87d-d590-5e606211f1b7@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:38:04 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Baoquan He , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, Dave Young , Tom Lendacky , Tianyu Lan , Thomas Zimmermann , Vasily Gorbik , Heiko Carstens , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Daniel Vetter , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 9/16/21 8:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:26:06AM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: >> I have a Intel variant patch (please check following patch). But it includes >> TDX changes as well. Shall I move TDX changes to different patch and just >> create a separate patch for adding intel_cc_platform_has()? > > Yes, please, so that I can expedite that stuff separately and so that it > can go in early in order for future work to be based ontop. Sent it part of TDX patch series. Please check and cherry pick it. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210916183550.15349-2-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com/ > > Thx. > -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer