linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Zhu Ebony-r57400" <ebony.zhu@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:28:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A85281E5-1E9C-4938-8940-CF696C3C5174@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32F3CC26D4DAC44E8ECD07155727A46E85D6E4@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net>


On Jan 25, 2007, at 2:25 AM, Zhu Ebony-r57400 wrote:

>
>> No, I think the round handler should try to do the rounding
>> by hand.
>> Since you have the non rounded information provided by HW,
>> its much simpler to just do the rounding step.
>
> Hi Kumar,
>
> I have some new thoughts about rounding handler.
> Suppose we set SPEFSCR[FRMC]=0b10 (rounding towards +Inf) and
> a normal "efsmul" may generate rounding interrupt. At this time,
> according
> to manual, unrounded (truncated) result is placed in the target
> register. Please
> note the target register contains a hexadecimal representation of a
> floating point number. Since it represents a floating point number
> exactly
> so we can not round it anymore.

I don't follow what you mean by not being able to round it anymore.

> Maybe we still need to emulate the whole "efsmul" instruction by
> software.

You can't always do that.  Think about the following instruction:

	efsmul	r3, r3, r3

You'll have lost the original value of r3 when the exception occurs.

- k

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-25  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-12  5:19 [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12  5:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-01-12  5:46   ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-12  8:27     ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12 12:06       ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-15  8:41         ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12  6:38   ` [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754standard Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12  6:49     ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-12 12:03     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-15  8:16       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-15 16:08         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-12  6:41 ` [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard Kumar Gala
2007-01-12  8:09   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12 12:04     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-15  6:45       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-15 15:54         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-12 18:36     ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-15  6:37       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-15 14:37         ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-16  9:54           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-25  8:25           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-25  8:28             ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2007-01-25  8:53               ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-25 15:10                 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-26  6:16                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-29 10:00                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-29 14:30                     ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-31  9:45                       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-31 14:48                         ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-01  9:35                           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-07  5:52           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-07  7:11             ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-07  7:21               ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-07  7:57                 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-07  8:04                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  3:50                   ` [patch][0/5] powerpc V2 : " Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  5:18                     ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-08  5:40                       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  7:06                       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  7:15                         ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-08  8:08                           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08 17:18                             ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-09  5:15                               ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-07-30 14:56                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-31  3:36                                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A85281E5-1E9C-4938-8940-CF696C3C5174@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ebony.zhu@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).