Re: BootX

[kevin diggs <diggskevin38@gmail.com>]

Hi,

4.2.4 does NOT work.

4.1.2 DOES work.

Is there some magic PowerPC specific gcc patch somewhere? Should I
reorient the computer relative to the planet's magnetic field when I
compile with newer gcc? A magic handshake? what?

Is anyone using a compiler newer than 4.1.2?

Sorry, but I do not know where to go from here?

kevin

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:24 PM, kevin diggs <diggskevin38@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I enable SMP then I can build a 2.6.28 kernel with gcc 4.3.5 that
> WILL boot on the PowerMac8600 (single 750GX). The previously mentioned
> G4 that runs is a dual cpu beast and thus also runs SMP.
>
> I at least know this (ok, I THINK I know):
>
> For non-SMP:  The spinlock 'acct_lock' in kernel/acct.c that IS
> present in 3.4.6 (i.e. kernel 2.6.28 compiled with gcc 3.4.6). Not so
> much for 4.3.5. I have not yet done a general 4.3.5 compiled 2.6.28
> spinlock safari.
>
> Don't some funky, optimizery things happen to spinlocks for the NON-smp case?
>
> I'll see what the 4.2.x gcc does.
>
> Thanks!
>
> kevin
>
> P.S.:  There is one other difference for the SMP 4.3.5 compiled
> 2.6.28:  my 750gx cpufreq driver gets disabled. It is fairly isolated
> code though. Should not be able to nuke the spinlock in kernel/acct.c
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:26 PM, kevin diggs <diggskevin38@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Anyone familiar with BootX? Could my problems with the 8600 be related
>> to some interaction with BootX?
>>
>> kevin
>>
>