From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f170.google.com (mail-gx0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FD8B6ED0 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:01:13 +1000 (EST) Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so493451gxk.15 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:01:11 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 405EX Rev D mis-identification? From: Lee Nipper To: Marc Chidester Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: lee.nipper@gmail.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06, Marc Chidester wrot= e: > It looks like the Rev D version of the 405EX chip without security > will be identified as a 405EXr, based on the values in the cpu_specs > table. =A0For 405EX/405EXr the pvr_mask is =A00xffff0004 with the > pvr_value's as 0x12910004 and 0x12910000 respectively. I see that the > Rev D PVR value for the 405EX without security is 0x12911473, which > would mask out to the EXr value. > > Is there an algorithm update needed or am I missing something? With 405EX Rev D, we have noticed that we must reset our board one time after the initial powerup to make the PVR read correctly. See this post: http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-December/079099.html