From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gy0-f179.google.com (mail-gy0-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C78B6EFF for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:52:14 +1000 (EST) Received: by gya1 with SMTP id 1so3255406gya.38 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:52:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca In-Reply-To: <0A40042D85E7C84DB443060EC44B3FD325420B9123@dekaexchange07.deka.local> References: <1276617907-10862-1-git-send-email-emillbrandt@dekaresearch.com> <20100622230026.GA2453@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20100803055216.GA25306@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <0A40042D85E7C84DB443060EC44B3FD325420B9123@dekaexchange07.deka.local> From: Grant Likely Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:44:59 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] mpc5200 ac97 gpio reset To: Eric Millbrandt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mark Brown , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Eric Millbrandt wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+emillbrandt=3Ddekaresearch.com@lists.ozlabs.o= rg >> [mailto:linuxppc-dev- >> bounces+emillbrandt=3Ddekaresearch.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Ma= rk >> Brown >> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 01:52 >> To: Grant Likely >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Eric Millbrandt >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] mpc5200 ac97 gpio reset >> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:42:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Mark Brown >> >> > > I'm a little concerned with a collision with multi codec here. It'd >> > > be handy if you could keep it separate in case it needs merging >> > > into both trees (or we could merge via ASoC only). >> >> > Hmmm. =A0Yeah, probably better to take it via your tree then. =A0I've >> > currently got patch 1 in linux-next, but I'll drop it before asking >> > benh to pull. =A0Go ahead and add my acked-by. >> >> Looks like multi-component is slightly too late for .36 and I don't have >> the original patch any more since it looked like you were going to be >> carrying it... =A0could you restore the patch to your tree please? > > Grant, are you going to pick up this series for .36? Yes, working on it... :-) g.