From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ey0-f170.google.com (mail-ey0-f170.google.com [209.85.215.170]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF53EB7118 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:24:37 +1000 (EST) Received: by eyb6 with SMTP id 6so3023631eyb.15 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:24:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1282936005-17078-1-git-send-email-Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com> From: Kyle Moffett Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:24:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kvm/e500_tlb: Fix a minor copy-paste tracing bug To: Alexander Graf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Liu Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Moffett List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 20:58, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 27.08.2010, at 21:06, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> The kvmppc_e500_stlbe_invalidate() function was trying to pass too many >> parameters to trace_kvm_stlb_inval(). =C2=A0This appears to be a bad >> copy-paste from a call to trace_kvm_stlb_write(). > > Which kernel is this against? That trace point is already commented out i= n my tree. Oh, hm, I guess I haven't rebased this patch since 2.6.35-ish. The trace point seems to work correctly with the fixed arguments; if you'll tell me which tree I should base it on I can easily resubmit. Cheers, Kyle Moffett